Back to @NEARProtocol's profile

NEAR Protocol engagement report

@NEARProtocol - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
0.332%
109K views on a typical post
Reach
5.96%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
360
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.03/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 981 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NEAR Protocol's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, NEAR Protocol sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 20262.7x their median

    MAINNET UPGRADE Quantum-safe signing is now live on NEAR mainnet. This makes NEAR one of the first blockchains with a NIST-approved post-quantum signature scheme in production. The upgrade also launches dynamic resharding, so NEAR Protocol can scale itself automatically 🧵 https://t.co/YvpvGwkYZU

    7001855541656K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20262.7x their median

    NEW LAUNCH Confidential Intents is now generally available, bringing NEAR's confidential execution infrastructure to all builders. Devs and dApps can bring confidential execution to their users through the NEAR Intents 1Click Swap API. The privacy renaissance runs on NEAR 🧵 https://t.co/ZcomnOYgjQ

    7121495147442K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20262.6x their median

    [email protected] is live: an incentive milestone program for people using Confidential Intents on near​.com. If you've been swapping confidentially, you're already in for Drop 1. https://t.co/PMBcquAQNo

    6821143391467K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.3x their median

    NEW LAUNCH Staking for NEAR AI is live. Pay for confidential inference and always-on agents by staking NEAR. No card. No cloud account. No custodian holding your credentials. 🧵 https://t.co/HDeXDFC3MN

    6191295226792K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.2x their median

    🔥 LATEST: Banks and regulators across Europe, the Middle East and Asia are testing quantum-resistant crypto wallets and onchain transfers using a NEAR testnet. https://t.co/eSNAKb2fEr

    4921798629131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.9x their median

    NEAR is one of the first blockchains to support post-quantum signing and advance towards post-quantum readiness. The full roadmap: https://t.co/BxuRjGqrfy

    58587127147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.8x their median

    NEAR AI Cloud now runs confidential inference verified by @intel Trust Authority. Intel is already a NEAR AI confidential hardware partner, supplying the isolation that protects your data. Now every workload returns an Intel-signed proof you can check yourself. https://t.co/7FuS9OZvwh

    53687218118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20261.7x their median

    $25 billion has now moved through NEAR Intents. More chains. More assets. More reasons to route through one place. The flywheel keeps compounding. How we got here, and where it's going 🧵 https://t.co/C5tLNCkGl3

    51279194117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20261.7x their median

    NEAR Intents is becoming a single liquidity layer reachable from across crypto. Interfaces, assets, and chains can all route into the same execution layer. 🧵 https://t.co/MR9F3UmgOT

    49678283154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20261.6x their median

    Post-quantum migration runs on an industry clock. Custodians, wallets, tools, and agents all need time to move before quantum breaks today’s signatures. NEAR’s mainnet upgrade to quantum-safe accounts already starts that clock. https://t.co/8Mi2T0tC1d

    51452242145K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 360 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video, 18% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 981 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.

What is NEAR Protocol's engagement rate on X?
NEAR Protocol (@NEARProtocol) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,820,095 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, NEAR Protocol sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NEARProtocol have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NEARProtocol post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going