Back to @NASAJPL's profile

NASA JPL engagement report

@NASAJPL - 3.7M followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 3.7M followers
Per impression
0.853%
71K views on a typical post
Reach
1.90%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
604
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
39 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 604 interactions against 3.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 0.853% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NASA JPL's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, NASA JPL sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 9, 202658x their median

    Introducing Artemis III. Four astronauts. Three launches. Two dockings. One splashdown. In 2027, the Artemis III mission will practice docking the Orion spacecraft with two lunar landers in low Earth orbit — the capability we need to return humanity to the Moon’s surface. https://t.co/8uhMUxuuWX

    28K5.7K1.0K4432.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202625x their median

    The International Space Station orbited over Los Angeles on July 4th as America marked 250 years of independence with a burst of fireworks lighting up the city below — a celebration so bright it reached all the way to space! https://t.co/SMCXTFYRjD

    13K2.2K200139881K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202623x their median

    Since arriving at its destination five years ago, our Perseverance Mars rover has collected data that hints at a history of past life on the Red Planet. Catch up on Percy’s biggest discoveries in this week’s episode of our Curious Universe podcast: https://t.co/J5dh8FhHjw https://t.co/JfchYJscsY

    11K2.0K54285716K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 202612x their median

    We're thinking about it. https://t.co/oQosHFPV10

    6.3K8772421351.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20268.1x their median

    In its 14 years on Mars, the Curiosity rover has taken more than 700,000 images, but this one is special – because it was one of the first. Happy landiversary, Curiosity! https://t.co/shl2n30dQg

    4.3K5246332126K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20265.6x their median

    Photo finish! 🏁📸 On June 14, Perseverance completed a Martian “marathon” by surpassing 26.2 miles (42.195 kilometers) of travel. The day before, NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter snapped this view of the rover and its tracks from space. https://t.co/ju3nRTAGfm

    2.8K5144030123K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20264.6x their median

    It’s a Martian marathon! NASA's Perseverance Rover has surpassed a total distance of 26.2 miles (42.195 kilometers) of travel on the Red Planet. It crossed the milestone while exploring intriguing ancient terrain to the west of Jezero Crater. https://t.co/kWd7iSImUM

    2.3K3916430412K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20264.5x their median

    On July 20, 1976, NASA’s Viking 1 lander broke ground on 50 years of Mars surface exploration. From the first landing, to rovers crossing the desert, to helicopter flights, we’ve been digging into the secrets of Mars ever since. https://t.co/gb5V7LQsuR

    2.1K469643288K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 20263.8x their median

    Four JPL-built propulsive drones – known as MoonFall – will survey the lunar surface at potential @NASAArtemis landing sites in unprecedented detail. The mission is part of the initial phase of the @NASAMoonBase initiative. Learn more: https://t.co/2NJXRlgOoW https://t.co/ygATe3rzVA

    2.0K40387441.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.4x their median

    What was once only visible from a distance, we could now reach out and grasp… Throughout history, humanity dreamed of Mars – but it was never within reach. That changed 50 years ago when NASA's Viking 1 lander touched down on the surface of the Red Planet on July 20, 1976. https://t.co/wB1XQeoOVf

    1.7K3105326134K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 604 interactions against 3.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 0.853% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.90% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 20% are part of a thread and 53% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.

What is NASA JPL's engagement rate on X?
NASA JPL (@NASAJPL) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,717,088 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, NASA JPL sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @NASAJPL have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @NASAJPL post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going