Back to @N4er5BANKPkQFQe's profile

369不動 engagement report

@N4er5BANKPkQFQe - 134K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.515%
of 134K followers
Per impression
4.95%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
10.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
694
interactions (median)
Saved
0.296%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.23/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 694 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.515%. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 4.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 92x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.515%, 369不動 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 118 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 8, 202692x their median

    🚨‼️ BREAKING: Declassified CIA files expose U.S. plans to control the world by manipulating the weather. All those chemtrails in the sky… 100% now confirmed real. https://t.co/URv6sLLXc9

    40K22K9369951.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202660x their median

    国連 気候変動が無かったと 公に発表した 太陽光発電は利権だった https://t.co/im0ccSubh9

    30K11K286471685K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 202626x their median

    こんなこと言われる政治家見たことがない 「2億回打って死亡者ゼロ」という発言からもう5年経ちましたが 日本では約4億3619万回打ち込まれて 国が認めただけで死亡認定1071名ですよ 誰も間違いを認めないし 未だに国をあげて有害事象の全例調査をしようともしない コロナワクチンは重要な懸念はないそうです

    13K4.5K187140514K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 202615x their median

    外国勢力の国家的 意図のもと 反日 テロを企てる 国会議員 朝鮮 帰化人 中国帰化人 は 国家反逆罪に処すべき https://t.co/tnoXxkfyka

    7.9K2.6K1364054K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.8x their median

    本日(8/24)厚労省前「薬害根絶の誓い」 新型コロナワクチンで30代のご子息を亡くされた東正秋さんが、上野大臣に直訴 ぜひ厚労大臣は、遺族や被害者と面会して、直接話を聞いてほしい。 #薬害根絶デー https://t.co/Zj1wlUDTsM

    2.9K1.0K3137135K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.6x their median

    https://t.co/UEvHxPAkNc

    3.1K7575334555K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 20265.6x their median

    これからも GHQ 婆が(高市早苗)が 日本国民を 苦しめて行くだけです https://t.co/ogxAgClwft

    2.8K1.0K273160K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20264.8x their median

    私は医師ですが 日本で外国人が出産する事に よって 出産一時金そして児童手当が 貰えてしまう それは おかしいんじゃないですか と言う意見をポストしたところ もの凄い バッシングに遭いましたが 私が間違っていますか https://t.co/TPA8db7uEa

    2.4K7381404031K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20263.9x their median

    売国 日本では とんでもない 事が 起きている https://t.co/r0gUgclHok

    2.0K731112048K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20263.1x their median

    JULIAN ASSANGE: THE ROTHSCHILDS JUST LOST CONTROL OF THE WEATHER. https://t.co/B2jOPLgyGv

    1.7K4254216115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 694 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.515%. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 4.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.23 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 92x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is 369不動's engagement rate on X?
369不動 (@N4er5BANKPkQFQe) has an engagement rate of 0.515%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 134,296 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.515%, 369不動 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @N4er5BANKPkQFQe have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @N4er5BANKPkQFQe post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going