Back to @MvanRoosmalen's profile

marcel van roosmalen engagement report

@MvanRoosmalen - 93K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 93K followers
Per impression
0.085%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
5.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.085% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 143 interactions. Recurring topics include #tiktok, #nieuwegein, #tullentwaal.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #tiktok, #nieuwegein, #tullentwaal.

Compared with accounts its own size

marcel van roosmalen's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, marcel van roosmalen sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 56 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 16, 2026

    Ontroerend https://t.co/ZXKyf3U67n

    12731309.8K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 2026

    De KNVB wil geen inhoudelijke update geven over de beoordeling van de overname van Vitesse. Dat laat een woordvoerder van de onafhankelijke licentiecommissie woensdagochtend weten na vragen van De Gelderlander. Lees: https://t.co/ERkRvTj4UF https://t.co/RiuVGKbhd0

    55835875K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 202517x their median

    https://t.co/IpHfB31rvb

    41223173K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 2026

    Op pad met Marcel van Roosmalen: 'Dit was echt de hel' | Nieuwe Revu https://t.co/WFN69GShja

    4720331K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202613x their median

    https://t.co/nxFAustqGn

    4263010K viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 2026

    Waar Vitesse het seizoen aanvankelijk niet eens mocht starten, omdat de proflicentie was ingetrokken, gloort nu een periodetitel voor de Arnhemmers. De route van Vitesse naar de Eredivisie. https://t.co/dQdSkQOV59

    3542229K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20269.8x their median

    Ik wil graag dit NRC-artikel met je delen: "Als Donny Roelvink ooit radicaliseert, is dat de schuld van Renze Klamer " https://t.co/uojw3n8dOI

    3027014K viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 20269.8x their median

    Ik wil graag dit NRC-artikel met je delen: "De kern van het Joep Schreuder zijn" https://t.co/ns5FgZDg3g

    2728232K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20268.3x their median

    #Alkmaar https://t.co/NT5NXvBxLI

    291307.1K viewsView on X
  • Mar 4, 2026

    Deel 4, we blijven achter de feiten aanlopen. Overloaded heads galore. Op reportage in #Nuenen bespreken we alvast de reportage in #Bladel , die dit weekend online komt. #DGWW https://t.co/lAnqYBdzFr

    2304012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#tiktok#nieuwegein#tullentwaal#vianen

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.085% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 143 interactions. Recurring topics include #tiktok, #nieuwegein, #tullentwaal.

What is marcel van roosmalen's engagement rate on X?
marcel van roosmalen (@MvanRoosmalen) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,804 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, marcel van roosmalen sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MvanRoosmalen have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MvanRoosmalen post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going