Back to @MuzFN's profile

XSET Muz engagement report

@MuzFN - 553K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.47%
of 553K followers
Per impression
2.80%
92K views on a typical post
Reach
16.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
31 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 553K followers, an engagement rate of 0.47%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 2.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

XSET Muz's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.47%, XSET Muz sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.434% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20263.3x their median

    did we make the tourney exciting by winning b2b at least ?

    8.0K922654165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20263.0x their median

    if u see me roaming the streets of paris feel free to kill me

    7.3K12224618445K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20242.4x their median

    🏆 FORTNITE ESPORTS WORLD CUP CHAMPIONS ($400,000) 🏆 I love my teammates so much ❤️ Special shoutout to @SvenSE_ this dude put so much prep in the entire week he deserves it all. https://t.co/MXWrxSDXSV

    5.8K16526271.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20262.2x their median

    🇫🇷 🔜 https://t.co/N02pLPia9F

    5.6K69692120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.1x their median

    b2b2b 5th in Grands @RiseFn ($25,000) Wasn't meant to be. Qualified Belgium 🫡😢 https://t.co/R0Fa57POqE

    5.1K812015107K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 20262.0x their median

    One Year Broadcast diff 🍌 https://t.co/dWiEUrTa7N

    5.0K521460164K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.9x their median

    threw on my old xset merch from last year & this shit big as hell 😭✌️ https://t.co/3I9uuU6lJk

    4.7K361803154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261.9x their median

    coulda been a 4x today https://t.co/0QcQRjZWB9

    4.6K79610105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2026

    im sick to my stomach

    3.7K20123196K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    17th ewc triple conned +$13k 😴 hope yall had fun 🙏 belgium soon 🤙 https://t.co/iP2hlhSbnw

    3.1K2858186K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 553K followers, an engagement rate of 0.47%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 92K times each, and 2.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.

What is XSET Muz's engagement rate on X?
XSET Muz (@MuzFN) has an engagement rate of 0.47%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 553,109 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.47%, XSET Muz sits above the 75th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MuzFN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MuzFN post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going