Back to @MuyInteresanteM's profile

Muy Interesante MX engagement report

@MuyInteresanteM - 273K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 273K followers
Per impression
0.049%
2.0K views on a typical post
Reach
0.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 0.049% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8 interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Muy Interesante MX's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Muy Interesante MX sits below the 10th percentile of the 68,716 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,716 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,382 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 205 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 20268.0x their median

    En 1998, un médico británico publicó un estudio con doce niños que vinculaba la vacuna triple vírica con el autismo. El problema no era solo que estuviera equivocado: es que sabía que lo estaba. https://t.co/nPmjoOB6Mm

    53002.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.0x their median

    Un fósil del Devónico descubierto en China revela que un primitivo pez sin mandíbulas utilizaba su insólita cabeza con forma de alas para desplazarse por el agua con una eficiencia inesperada. https://t.co/2zdwIBnyIL

    61002.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.0x their median

    Un estudio de 704 herramientas de piedra revela que los neandertales llegaron a zonas de Arabia consideradas inhabitables para ellos 55.000 años AP. https://t.co/4ld855WFKn

    50003.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.0x their median

    Un extraño pez cubierto de filamentos y capaz de confundirse con las algas ha resultado ser una especie desconocida para la ciencia. https://t.co/ynaZDGSIuv

    3000796 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.0x their median

    Durante siglos, hemos perfeccionado nuestra idea del Sistema Solar. Sin embargo, el dibujo que hoy aprendemos en la escuela esconde una fascinante trampa gravitatoria. https://t.co/ymkoP8KF8P

    2010991 viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20263.0x their median

    Un estudio de 165 yacimientos de Awunbarna revela cómo los artistas aborígenes comenzaron a representar enormes Seres Ancestrales mientras la llegada europea transformaba su territorio. https://t.co/tsPXOEezgD

    30002.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.0x their median

    Lo ocurrido en Nepal no es un caso aislado: 15 millones de personas viven bajo la amenaza directa de tsunamis glaciares. ¿Dónde se concentran los puntos más críticos del planeta? https://t.co/Gcp9y7fI6s

    30002.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.0x their median

    Descubre el giro invisible del latín entre los siglos II y V d. C. : cómo el cristianismo reprogramó palabras que todavía moldean nuestro lenguaje. https://t.co/0fh4exPWIK

    21002.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.0x their median

    Una tumba de Luxor utilizada durante más de 300 años conserva momias colocadas unas sobre otras y hasta un perro momificado, pero lo que parecía una acumulación caótica escondía una sorprendente lógica funeraria. https://t.co/s6Q4Gdlmod

    21002.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.0x their median

    Once nuevas puntas de flecha grabadas en un asentamiento neolítico de Turquía amplían un enigma de hace unos 9.000 años: nadie sabe todavía qué significaban sus misteriosas marcas. https://t.co/IJiekMbo44

    21002.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 0.049% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8 interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.

What is Muy Interesante MX's engagement rate on X?
Muy Interesante MX (@MuyInteresanteM) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,516 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Muy Interesante MX sits below the 10th percentile of the 68,716 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MuyInteresanteM have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MuyInteresanteM post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going