Back to @MultiversX's profile

Multiversᕽ engagement report

@MultiversX - 967K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 967K followers
Per impression
1.55%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
2.80%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
420
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.9/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 420 interactions against 967K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 36x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #multiversxtech, #mvxpulse, #foxfrens.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026. Recurring tags: #multiversxtech, #mvxpulse, #foxfrens.

Compared with accounts its own size

Multiversᕽ's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, Multiversᕽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 396 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 202636x their median

    JUST IN: Bitcoin stolen from Coldcard hardware wallet hack now exceeds $88,000,000.

    12K1.3K7845933.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.0x their median

    MultiversX is back online. Thank you for your patience and belief through these hard days. To our validators and partners: thank you for the work that brought us here. We’re proud to be here with you. We continue to build different. Together.

    900251972755K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.3x their median

    27 days.

    6561451463098K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.2x their median

    A New Genesis https://t.co/6It8ArLJ2Y

    667218281981K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20262.1x their median

    Let’s write history together. Leave one line for the next chapter of MultiversX. Onchain forever and sealed into the first block of Supernova. https://t.co/JJT42V10PB

    5591861202795K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.0x their median

    ✅ Secure Proof of Stake ✅ Meritocratic validator selection ✅ ~3,200 active validators ✅ Zero equivocation ✅ Formally verified VM ✅ Fully sharded, horizontally scalable ✅ Parallel cross-shard execution ✅ ~$0.0002 per transfer ✅ Unconsumed gas refunded ✅ Gas abstraction ✅ Onchain 2FA ✅ Protocol-native tokens ✅ Fungible tokens ✅ Non-fungible tokens ✅ Semi-fungible tokens ✅ Multi-token transfer ✅ WASM smart contracts ✅ Custom-built Virtual Machine ✅ Native VM elliptic curve operations ✅ Multi-VM customizable chains (Lightspeed SDK) ✅ Reproducible smart contract builds ✅ Upgradeable contracts ✅ Chain Simulator ✅ Millisecond-precision smart contract timestamps ✅ Mature onchain governance ✅ KPI-gated emissions ✅ Developer royalties ✅ MCP integration ✅ Agentic Commerce Stack (x402, UCP, ACP, AP2) ✅ MX-8004 agent identity standard ✅ Agent Builder Hub ✅ Carbon negative ✅ Validators run on 4 cores and 8 GB RAM 🔜 <250ms finality 🔜 600ms blocks 🔜 Rebuilt consensus engine ⏳ Protocol-native Zero Knowledge proof ⏳ Instant delegation migration ⏳ Guardian activation at wallet creation Built different.

    5852123824103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.0x their median

    $EGLD deposits and withdrawals on @BinanceUS have been reenabled. We are working with all outstanding exchanges to be fully operational as soon as possible. https://t.co/L0xl3JoeZy

    66015128631K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    Supernova features in @Cointelegraph today. Good writeup about how we decouple consensus from execution to achieve finality below 250ms and 600ms blocks on a fully sharded network. https://t.co/Y1m6NpJR29

    60220423840K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.9x their median

    Yesterday our Devnet started producing ten blocks in the same time it used to take to make one. 6s → 600ms Supernova is the largest upgrade in our history. Sub-second finality, with the same validators, the same security, and the same low fees. The internet-scale blockchain. https://t.co/9FeNVyLPLM

    573175281337K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.8x their median

    Supernova is landing on Devnet. Tomorrow at 14:25 UTC. https://t.co/lTiQQ4h5AT

    557157401443K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#multiversxtech#mvxpulse#foxfrens#supernova

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 420 interactions against 967K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 36x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #multiversxtech, #mvxpulse, #foxfrens.

What is Multiversᕽ's engagement rate on X?
Multiversᕽ (@MultiversX) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 966,919 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, Multiversᕽ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MultiversX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MultiversX post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going