Back to @MuellerSheWrote's profile

Mueller, She Wrote engagement report

@MuellerSheWrote - 723K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.549%
of 723K followers
Per impression
10.3%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
5.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.109%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.73/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 723K followers, an engagement rate of 0.549%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 10.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #beanstalk, #thepoliticsbar, #westwing. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #beanstalk, #thepoliticsbar, #westwing.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.549%, Mueller, She Wrote sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link83% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 18, 202415x their median

    NEW: As promised, here is my new ad for #HarrisWalz. My story never gets easier to tell, but everything is on the line this election. Please watch and share 🙏🫶 🎥 @dprzygoda https://t.co/OZglJYaA5c

    41K16K5311.7K9.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.3x their median

    French prosecutors have found new investigative leads in the Epstein case, and have identified 13 new victims. https://t.co/aCTiZVm5n7

    12K5.0K9384116K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.4x their median

    A couple of thoughts on Natalie Harp. First, I'm so glad that people on our side are concerned about her and her mental health. It's because we have hearts and empathy and we aren't sociopaths. We're good people, and I love that about us. But I think we are also right to be angry. Natalie Harp is a government employee, paid by tax dollars and accountable to the people. She’s 35, and while it seems her emotional growth may have been stunted at a younger age by trauma, there are millions of us who can say the same, but none of us are propping up a murderous dictator. There are also national security concerns. She spent a year at the White House without clearance - and as a gatekeeper to Trump - she’s a vulnerable entry point for enemies. That's especially bad since Donald is also a useful idiot. She’s clearly been hurt. Perhaps by a cult or an abuser, and hurt people hurt people. But at some point, the bad acts can’t be legally or politically tolerated. That’s why we put Ghislaine Maxwell - who started out a s a victim - in prison for sex trafficking. Natalie Harp’s job is to keep Trump happy so he can focus on being a brutal autocrat. She's a taxpayer-funded enabler. Reporting on her is no different than reporting on Leavitt or Bondi. She's not off-limits. And she has faster access to quality mental health care than any of us.

    7.8K1.5K18641192K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.5x their median

    BREAKING: Trump’s FCC pushes Talarico Kimmel interview to YouTube, trampling the First Amendment. Sound familiar? It happened with Talarico and Colbert last February, which resulted in $2.5M in donations and millions of views. https://t.co/iKvTJptRhs

    4.5K1.5K671735K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Trump has been rigging polls in his favor for at least 11 years with the help of Michael Cohen. A brief trip down memory lane, with receipts: https://t.co/5P0Vbhb8hw

    3.9K1.6K411453K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    Okay everyone. Here’s the YouTube interview with @jimmykimmel and @jamestalarico. You know what to do. Watch it. Share it. Donate. Bury them. https://t.co/Equihk4a72

    2.9K1.8K232742K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    BREAKING: I've just filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the Slush Fund lawsuit brought by @Public_Citizen on my behalf. We are asking the court to declare unlawful and set aside the "settlement", and to block DOJ from re-establishing the fund in the future. We've also filed opposition to the DOJ's motion to dismiss our case. I'll post a link to the full filings in this thread once they're available. Link to doc: https://t.co/MlvizWik2P

    2.5K76122927K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Today we're endorsing @AngieNixon for U.S. Senate. Angie is a fighter. She's a state representative, a mom, and a fierce union organizer. She has built a powerful grassroots campaign that has put this seat solidly on the map, and we're proud to be with her. Let's flip this seat! https://t.co/WYydhiBqlP

    2.3K6421285098K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    When Ramaswamy isn't taking a 20-minute private flight from Columbus to Akron, he's flying to Utah for a data center conference. This is truly as out-of-touch as it gets. https://t.co/94eJrLlIBq

    2.0K5231431642K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Trump: "The only reason that communities throughout the U.S.A. should not want Data Centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor. If they want to be successful and rich, with far lower taxes and jobs all over the place, let Data Reign. The good news is that there are plenty of other places that want them. If we kill the Golden Goose, you will only have yourselves to blame. China could not be happier with this anti Data Center movement. Actually, they can’t believe it is happening! President DJT"

    985181236129527K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#beanstalk#thepoliticsbar#westwing#aisle45pod#b

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 723K followers, an engagement rate of 0.549%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 10.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #beanstalk, #thepoliticsbar, #westwing. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Mueller, She Wrote's engagement rate on X?
Mueller, She Wrote (@MuellerSheWrote) has an engagement rate of 0.549%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 723,270 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.549%, Mueller, She Wrote sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MuellerSheWrote have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @MuellerSheWrote post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going