Back to @MsAvaArmstrong's profile

AvaArmstrong,🇺🇸 Author engagement report

@MsAvaArmstrong - 278K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.982%
of 278K followers
Per impression
9.21%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
10.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.127%
38 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.982%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 9.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #ice.

Compared with accounts its own size

AvaArmstrong,🇺🇸 Author's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 96% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.982%, AvaArmstrong,🇺🇸 Author sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 355 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 202618x their median

    BREAKING: 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals just ruled that Missouri must reinstate its new congressional map for the November Midterms. BIG WIN https://t.co/Dx8wsnXuAt

    43K5.1K4081191.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202611x their median

    Scott Bessent just flagged almost 5,000 payments worth close to $100 MILLION that were going to dead people How TF did the corruption in this country get so out of hand and when are we going to see people in prison for this shit?!?

    24K6.0K1.1K177143K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202610x their median

    Illegal Migrants complain that they are not allowed to cross the Polish border: “We want to enter Poland, but they won’t let us. They are threatening to harm us if we try to cross over. I want to go to Poland or Germany to have a good life.” Poland says NO to Open Borders! 🇵🇱 Every country needs to be like Poland

    20K4.0K3.5K521591K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.8x their median

    JD Vance can replace John Thune as Senate Majority Leader. It's his Constitutional right, as Vice President. John Adams did it for 4 whole years. This would mean that we could ram through the entire MAGA agenda before midterms. Should we make this happen? https://t.co/zQI5fz1NXc

    11K3.0K1.7K39987K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.6x their median

    Make no mistake about it. AOC and Hasan Piker aren’t strangers… They are political allies. AOC personally invited Piker onto her massive 2020 Twitch event to help mobilize voters. They shared a platform because they shared plenty of political ground. Same movement. Same audience. Plenty of ideological overlap. You don’t get to embrace the megaphone when it benefits you, then pretend you don’t recognize who was holding it.

    7.9K4.0K57518468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.6x their median

    I’m pissed off. We work so hard to combat the radical left and the anti-American Islamic jihadists who work to destroy our country everyday. And for what? So they can be rewarded? There is never going to be any accountability. I realized that today. We will never see it.

    6.2K7422.4K3154.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 21, 20263.1x their median

    Jessica Tarlov pushed the same false claim on Wednesday that Elon Musk slowed down Starlink to hurt Ukraine’s defenses. She cited a Wall Street Journal report that said Musk ordered the slowdown. He didn’t. The technology that got restricted wasn’t commercial Starlink. It was Starshield, the military system owned and controlled by the U.S. government. Ukraine has been using it for offensive strikes inside Russia when the system is meant for defensive purposes. Musk did not restrict Starshield. The U.S. government did. Lies like those from Tarlov are why I said yesterday that Musk should sue the Journal for defamation. Outlets print the false version of what happened with Starshield, then people like Tarlov treat it as settled fact and spread it further. Musk should sue Tarlov too. She should know the difference between Starlink and Starshield. If she doesn’t, she has no business talking about either one. Tarlov is a reminder of why it mattered that Musk bought Twitter. Now the same false claims she spreads can be corrected in public before they harden into the official story. The truth is easier to put in front of people than it used to be. Use it.

    6.3K1.9K1889367K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20263.1x their median

    Former CIA liberal bitches are a scourge to our Republic. Period. This chick is the worst. Threatening legal action to prevent young conservatives from entering politics. There’s absolutely nothing more vital to the future of our nation. She wants to burn it all down. This is disgusting, America! Do better! https://t.co/4P5MdabxBI

    6.5K1.6K2795793K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.9x their median

    They said it couldn’t be done. •Secure border. •Murder rate down. •Record highs. •Tariffs bringing work home. •DEI out. •Men out of women’s sports. •English official. •Hostages home. That’s the list they told you not to read. With more incoming. Washington can’t debate results, so they just scream and say orange man bad while fake news parrots lies. Save it. Share it. Remind them what winning looks like. We are winning. Let’s keep the house and senate. 2 more years folks.

    5.0K2.8K13310442K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.8x their median

    I will not be watching @FoxNews any longer, who is with me??? Let’s show them what a mistake they made!! #MAGA

    5.6K8331.1K9665K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ice

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.982%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 9.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 48K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is AvaArmstrong,🇺🇸 Author's engagement rate on X?
AvaArmstrong,🇺🇸 Author (@MsAvaArmstrong) has an engagement rate of 0.982%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 277,912 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.982%, AvaArmstrong,🇺🇸 Author sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MsAvaArmstrong have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MsAvaArmstrong post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going