Back to @MrLeonardKim's profile

Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ engagement report

@MrLeonardKim - 472K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 472K followers
Per impression
0.293%
4.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 472K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.293% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.868% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 565x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦'s engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 2026565x their median

    I’ve lived in LA for 14 years, this heat different bro.

    6.2K32415187123K viewsView on X
  • Apr 16, 202513x their median

    It’s time to get back to business… Who is ready to work smarter and make some real money this year? Let’s carve out the largest piece of the pie plausible for you and get the highest amount of addressable market share in your niche. It’s time for you to dominate your industry. It’s time for you to be number 1. Let’s go. Email me: [email protected]

    1271114152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.8x their median

    Man my favorite Italian restaurant closed 10 days ago… That means I have to learn how to make spaghetti aglio e olio at home…

    271609.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.7x their median

    I think I’m full. https://t.co/Sq34HFgxU8

    291209.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.4x their median

    I can’t picture someone buying kimchi from a company called Cleveland kitchen. https://t.co/06febIyLTN

    200904.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.2x their median

    Imma try a veal chop!!! https://t.co/dycM8BKiRP

    202313.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.1x their median

    Burbank has $10 food. https://t.co/nuP85N41uU

    200418.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.1x their median

    Cashier: You have really pretty eyes. Me: Thanks. I use them to see.

    2131010.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.9x their median

    Short rib https://t.co/uDmkVbjSSr

    202106.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    What do you do if the soup leaks out the dumpling??? πŸ˜† https://t.co/F5g9aqkskh

    160617.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 472K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.293% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.868% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 565x its own typical post.

What is Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦'s engagement rate on X?
Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ (@MrLeonardKim) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 471,750 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MrLeonardKim have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MrLeonardKim post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going