Back to @MrLeonardKim's profile

Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ engagement report

@MrLeonardKim - 470K followers on X

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 470K followers
Per impression
0.135%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.316% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 3390x its own typical post.

Measured over 51 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦'s engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 199 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20263390x their median

    I’ve lived in LA for 14 years, this heat different bro.

    6.2K32415187123K viewsView on X
  • Apr 16, 202594x their median

    It’s time to get back to business… Who is ready to work smarter and make some real money this year? Let’s carve out the largest piece of the pie plausible for you and get the highest amount of addressable market share in your niche. It’s time for you to dominate your industry. It’s time for you to be number 1. Let’s go. Email me: [email protected]

    1541518158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202624x their median

    I need to reverse engineer this and make it at home. https://t.co/Q9bENhYrl9

    390804.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202619x their median

    Excuse my French, but what the frick was wrong with me if I wanted to die this entire year, despite the fact that I… Drove a Ford GT, BMW M2CS, M3CS, M5CS, rode in the brand new 911 Porsche turbo hybrid, hung out with over 30 cats, fed squirrels at the beach, got into shape, fixed my health, went to Seattle, stayed in 5 star hotels, eat at amazing restaurants, went to a few concerts, saw some cool art shows, spent Mother’s Day with family, spent time at the beach and on hikes, spent a lot of time with friends and visited my grandparent’s graves multiple times. Damn. What was the point of all of that wanting to die, when so many good things happened too???

    2321308.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202619x their median

    Imma use my points to get a filet o fish. https://t.co/M2HNAhP9uW

    2827111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202618x their median

    Yay chilis!!! https://t.co/I6ubnOTnvT

    2401203.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202617x their median

    Yum https://t.co/rbPhzhdkyU

    301302.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202617x their median

    Man my favorite Italian restaurant closed 10 days ago… That means I have to learn how to make spaghetti aglio e olio at home…

    271609.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202616x their median

    I think I’m full. https://t.co/Sq34HFgxU8

    291209.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202616x their median

    I’m genuinely impressed by people who can build something alongside their 9-5 I have basically been stuck on the couch stressing about going back to work tomorrow since yesterday morning Overthinking everything Dreading what might come Panicking about a training I’m leading in the afternoon Pissed about the commute

    2307112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 51 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.135% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.316% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 51 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 3390x its own typical post.

What is Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦'s engagement rate on X?
Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ (@MrLeonardKim) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 51 original posts from the last 30 days against 470,184 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Leonard Kim ✝️πŸ₯πŸ¦β€πŸ”₯πŸ¦†πŸ’πŸŽπŸ¦”πŸ³πŸ¦“πŸ¦₯πŸ¦­πŸ¦«πŸ¦¨πŸ¦šπŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ¦ sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MrLeonardKim have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MrLeonardKim post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going