Colion Noir engagement report
@MrColionNoir - 594K followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 594K followers, an engagement rate of 0.333%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 5.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 114K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Colion Noir's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.333%, Colion Noir sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 941 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 5, 202458x their median
I don’t care what side of the political spectrum you’re on, this is not ok. Let’s be clear, this is thinly veiled threat against @elonmusk and @X https://t.co/PwI62HTAL6
- Jun 20, 202630x their median
Why You Don’t Shoot For The Head In Self-Defense: There’s a clip going around of a guy at the range drawing from concealment and putting fast rounds on target. Then a cop standing behind him says, “Yeah… but mine were all headshots.” And that comment exposes one of the biggest misunderstandings people have about self-defense shooting. Headshots are not the flex people think they are. Anybody can hit a head if you give them enough time. But self-defense is not about taking your time and stacking perfect holes on a paper target. It’s about stopping a threat as fast as humanly possible. So I put it on a timer. Headshots vs. center mass. At close distance, the headshots were slower and messier. At ten yards, pushing for the head caused rounds to come completely off target. And in real life, a miss is not just a miss. It’s a wall. A car. A house. Or an innocent person who had nothing to do with the fight. That’s why responsible self-defense training focuses on acceptable accuracy, combat accuracy, and putting fast, effective hits into the area most likely to stop the threat. The goal is not to kill. The goal is to stop the threat and go home. Full Video: https://t.co/vh666Tu7WC
- Jun 24, 20268.7x their median
“Why do you need an AR-15?” Ask the police. Because they have them. They have the rifles. They have the 30-round magazines. They have the gear politicians keep saying is too dangerous for you. And nobody asks them why they need it. Why? Because the answer is obvious: They carry it to confront violent people. But here’s the part everyone skips… Who meets that violent person first? You do. The cop shows up after the threat starts. You’re the one already there. No badge. No backup. No radio. No team. And the Supreme Court has already said police do not have a constitutional duty to protect you as an individual. So if the state keeps these tools for the people who arrive second… Why does it want to take them from the person who has to survive first? That’s the question. Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still asks, “Why do you need that?”
- Sep 13, 20266.1x their median
Clarence Thomas explained the Second Amendment in one sentence. And every politician who talks about what gun rights they are willing to “let” you keep should hear it. The Second Amendment does not grant the right. It assumes the right already exists. That means the government does not give you the right to keep and bear arms. The amendment tells the government what it cannot do to a right you already had. Rights first. Government second. That is the order. And once you understand that, every gun law looks different. Because now the government is the one that has to explain itself. Not you. Then Thomas tells a story about Justice Breyer asking what he would do if a man with a machete walked up on his porch demanding money. Thomas’s answer? He would be cleaning his guns. That is why this clip hits different. He does not just rule on the Second Amendment. He understands it. He lives it. And he connects it to the history most gun control speeches leave out: The 14th Amendment. Freed slaves. The right to defend yourself from people trying to kill you. Because a citizen who cannot protect his own life does not stay a citizen for very long. Do you think most politicians understand the Second Amendment, or do they just talk around it? Shop the America Hat here: https://t.co/YplOlyDFPM
- Sep 17, 20263.5x their median
A self-driving car saw a gun… pulled itself over… and called the cops on its own passengers. Now, were the people inside probably up to no good? Based on the story, yeah. But that’s not the part that bothers me. The part that bothers me is this: Waymo said it detected a violation of its terms of service involving a firearm. Terms of service. Not a gun law. Not a judge. A company policy. So what happens when a legal gun owner gets in? What happens if the camera sees an open carry gun? Does the car pull over? Does it lock the doors? Does it call police? Because once “liability” becomes the excuse, your rights don’t have to be banned directly. They can just become impossible to use inside the systems you depend on. Be honest: Would you get into a self-driving car if you knew it could call police because it saw your gun?
- Jun 27, 20263.7x their median
Trump says he’s working on national reciprocity. Carry in all 50 states. And this is about to expose a lot of people. Because if your driver’s license works when you cross state lines… Why shouldn’t your carry permit? If you’re trusted to protect your life in Texas, why does that right disappear the second you land in New York, California, or New Jersey? An imaginary line on a map should not erase your right to defend yourself. And this is where the “I support the Second Amendment, but…” crowd always tells on themselves. Because national reciprocity is the easy one. This isn’t even the AR-15 fight. This isn’t the magazine fight. This is just saying: If you went through the process, got licensed, and followed the law, your permit should be recognized nationwide. That is actual common sense. So watch who fights this. Because the people who oppose national reciprocity were never defending the Second Amendment. They were defending control. Now be honest: Should your carry permit work in all 50 states like your driver’s license? Or should every state get to decide whether your right to protect yourself disappears at the border? Drop your answer below — and send this to the person who still says, “I support the 2A, but…”
- Sep 15, 20263.2x their median
He thought the gun showing in his pocket made him look dangerous. The criminal saw something else. An opportunity. That is the part people miss. Most people see a gun and leave you alone. But you are not carrying because of most people. You are carrying because of the person who does not care. The person who sees you bent over. Sees your guard down. Sees the gun exposed. And thinks: I can take that. Your gun is not a warning sign. Not to everybody. To the wrong person, it becomes a target. A homing beacon. And now the thing you brought to protect yourself is in another man’s hand. That is why awareness matters. That is why concealment matters. That is why control matters. Because having a gun on you does not replace paying attention. It makes paying attention even more important. Be honest: does visible carry make you safer, or does it make you a target?
- Sep 18, 20263.1x their median
Ilhan Omar says guns are too easy to get in America. Then police reportedly pulled guns and ammunition from the apartment where her son lives. Her son was not arrested. The roommate was. And that distinction matters. Because the roommate is described as having a lengthy criminal record. So if this is the kind of person gun control is supposed to stop… what new law was going to do it? The legal gun owner goes to the counter. Fills out the forms. Passes the background check. Pays the fees. Waits for approval. The criminal skips all of that. That is the part politicians never want to sit with. Their laws land on the person who follows the law. Not the person already going around it. Then a reporter asked Ilhan Omar about what happened. Nothing. Not a word. Ask about somebody else’s tragedy, and there is a speech ready. Ask about guns in her own son’s apartment, and suddenly the microphone disappears. So here is the real question: Do gun bans stop criminals, or do they mostly create more rules for the people already following them?
- Jun 23, 20263.3x their median
Canada has almost every gun law American anti-gunners keep begging for. Magazine limits. Registration. Strict licensing. Regular citizens basically can’t carry. And when a gunman opened fire in Montreal, what was the government’s plan for everybody else? Lock your doors. Stay inside. Hide and hope. That’s it. The criminal still had a gun. The cops still had guns. The law-abiding people got a text alert telling them to wait and pray the door held. That’s the part nobody wants to admit. Gun control doesn’t make evil disappear. It just decides who’s allowed to fight back when evil shows up. So be honest: If a gunman is outside your home, your grocery store, or your kid’s park… Do you want a text alert? Or do you want the ability to defend yourself? Drop your answer below — and send this to the friend who still thinks Canada is the model America should copy. Extended Father's Day Sale: Code 2ADAD
- Sep 21, 20263.0x their median
Jake Paul said we need to update the Constitution because of the Second Amendment. I thought I knew where this was going. Then he said citizens may need drones, drone EMPs, RPGs, and anti-helicopter weapons. Not on my bingo card. But he accidentally made the purest 2A argument there is. Because anti-gun people love saying: “You can’t fight a tyrannical government with an AR-15.” Okay. Then let us have what the government has. That is the logical endpoint of their own argument. If the Second Amendment exists as a check on tyranny, then “the government has better weapons” is not an argument against the Second Amendment. It is an argument for taking it seriously. Where I split from Jake is simple: We do not need to rewrite the Second Amendment. We need to read it. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Arms. It does not say pistols and shotguns only. So be honest: Did Jake Paul accidentally make the best pro-2A argument of the year?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.0K interactions against 594K followers, an engagement rate of 0.333%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 5.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 114K interactions, about 58x its own typical post.
- What is Colion Noir's engagement rate on X?
- Colion Noir (@MrColionNoir) has an engagement rate of 0.333%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 594,030 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.333%, Colion Noir sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MrColionNoir have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MrColionNoir post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.