Back to @MoureDev's profile

Brais Moure engagement report

@MoureDev - 276K followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.08%
of 276K followers
Per impression
1.92%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
221
interactions (median)
Saved
0.534%
62 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.33/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 221 interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 63K interactions, about 285x its own typical post.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brais Moure's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.08%, Brais Moure sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,839 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,058 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link60% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 60% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 219 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 2026285x their median

    https://t.co/T0RiL2cIDx

    58K4.5K3770430K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202677x their median

    Pace the frontier https://t.co/uPjFd1SbRm

    16K6912391471.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202645x their median

    Acabo de publicar el render 3D de mi hígado. Salen 20 lesiones. Soy ingeniera y tengo un cáncer de mama metastásico. De esas 20 solo hay dos medidas en el informe de radiología, una en el segmento II de 20 mm y otra en el IVb de 19, las dos del TC del 8 de septiembre. Las otras 18 las ha sacado Polaris, mi sistema agéntico, y todavía no las ha validado nadie. En mayo un PET no vio nada ahí, en julio ya había metástasis y del TC de septiembre salen las 20. Es impactante que aparezcan tantas en tan poco tiempo. Del hígado el informe escrito dice «múltiples». Del hueso dice «incontables». Y eso es lo que más me ha chocado, que no ponga el número de lesiones. El primer visor que hice fue el de los huesos, y me sirvió de apoyo cuando decidimos con mi equipo qué lesión biopsiar. Ahora ya le he añadido el hígado y el tumor primario de la mama. Los puedes girar tu aqui 👇 https://t.co/CNK2JfUAV0 Cada vez tengo menos tiempo y espero que estas herramientas ayuden a agilizar procesos. Sigo alucinando que lo que construyo tiene impacto real en mi salud y en las decisiones que tomamos.

    7.3K2.4K21672807K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202617x their median

    Tremendo fondo de pantalla. 💚 https://t.co/4pdko3Pdmv

    3.5K22641588K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202615x their median

    Para los que algunas vez desarrollaron a mano, ¿Con cual editor empezaron? https://t.co/VtSnRLqDHX

    2.2K71952193194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202613x their median

    Cloudflare ha lanzado su propia skill completísima de auditorías de seguridad. Es la que utilizaban internamente en la empresa como sistema de detección de vulnerabilidades. → https://t.co/p2WjZT7phe https://t.co/tBTnodwdtc

    2.5K363182152K viewsView on X
  • Dec 24, 202513x their median

    Este es mi pequeño regalo de Navidad! 🎁 Todos mis Cursos y Guías para aprender programación y desarrollo de software desde cero 100% Gratis. ✓ +110 horas en vídeo ✓ +600 lecciones ✓ +200 páginas en pdf ✓ +1100 fundamentos y comandos Salud y felices fiestas 🤘 https://t.co/Cr35BPiNCb

    2.4K399586170K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20269.6x their median

    Microsoft ha lanzado su certificado profesional de Python! 📚 Desde fundamentos a desarrollo de proyectos 🗓️ 4 meses, 6 cursos y 137 horas en material 💼 Sin experiencia previa y pensada para dar el salto al mundo laboral https://t.co/OKhmWRg4A5 Y algo más muy importante ↓ https://t.co/JwTT0fohP5

    1.8K2879359K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.1x their median

    ¿Usas Redis como base de datos? Esto te interesa. Han creado una visualización 3D interactiva que explica cómo Redis procesa comandos, organiza estructuras, asigna memoria y persiste datos. Muy útil para estudiantes y devs que quieren entender Redis más allá de GET y SET. https://t.co/oAlvnDnare

    1.2K1616049K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.8x their median

    Feliz día de la programación! ¿Por qué el 13 de Septiembre? 👉🏼 Día 256 de este año (2^8) 👉🏼 Mayor potencia de 2 < 365 👉🏼 Valores que se pueden representar con un byte Deja de hacer vibe coding y ponte a estudiar fundamentos para dominar a la IA (y no al revés) 😉

    9231379220K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 221 interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 63K interactions, about 285x its own typical post.

What is Brais Moure's engagement rate on X?
Brais Moure (@MoureDev) has an engagement rate of 0.08%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 275,690 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.08%, Brais Moure sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MoureDev have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MoureDev post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going