Kgoshi Ya Lebowa engagement report
@Mothematiks - 201K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 167 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.083%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 174K interactions, about 1043x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Kgoshi Ya Lebowa's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.083%, Kgoshi Ya Lebowa sits above the 25th percentile of the 208,041 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.144%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.144% |
| 75th percentile | 0.683% |
| 90th percentile | 2.57% |
| 99th percentile | 82.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 73% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 18% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 263 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 11, 20251043x their median
Generous owner gave them full uninterrupted access but now they are panicking 🤭😅 https://t.co/QR7UlmPZEm
- Oct 8, 202613x their median
It seems like South Africa has tens of thousands of drug labs. Clearly they were protected before.
- Sep 14, 20268.9x their median
What tickles your fancy, farm life or city life? https://t.co/DynMbqqhuH
- Oct 8, 20267.5x their median
Asylum seekers waiting in snaking queues in Marabastad say the locals' protest has disturbed the processes that started smoothly earlier today. @LindA_MniSii reports. Watch: https://t.co/91yF9A3pKW https://t.co/vwXP6EZIQM
- Oct 8, 20262.7x their median
Specialist immigration lawyer Craig Smith tells @StephenGrootes that the Constitutional Court ruling on asylum was correct because it ensures that genuine applicants are attended to. Watch: https://t.co/t8FhvRZEgg https://t.co/HgOH1n2TJ8
- Oct 8, 2026
An aloof president that is slow and reactive is extremely dangerous. A smart president would have gotten ahead of this way back in July. The presidency is clearly a side hustle to him.
- Sep 14, 2026
I am a villager 🙏🏾💚🐐 https://t.co/MT2l4FILX9
- Oct 8, 2026
Daniel was the king then but even he couldn’t come back from this 😅🤣 https://t.co/j4S6kLiTZF
- Oct 8, 2026
The Constitutional Court did not rule on the “first country of safety” principle. That is a separate proposal in Cabinet’s revised immigration White Paper, which the government says still needs to be turned into legislation. The case people are reacting to is Scalabrini Centre v Minister of Home Affairs, decided on 7 July 2026. The Court confirmed that parts of the Refugees Act were unconstitutional because they let officials block asylum seekers from having their claims assessed on their merits because they had entered South Africa irregularly, lacked an asylum transit visa, or reported late. The Court said procedural breaches alone cannot shut someone out of the asylum process where they may face persecution or serious harm if returned. That means an asylum claim must be considered; it does not mean the claim must be accepted. The judgment does not grant asylum, citizenship or blanket legal status to foreign nationals. Home Affairs itself says those claims are false. On “first safe country”: Cabinet’s policy proposes that people who already have protection elsewhere, or travelled through designated safe countries, could be ineligible to claim asylum here. But the government said the policy would require legislative amendments, annual designation of safe countries and arrangements to reduce the risk of sending people back into danger. That policy was not decided by the Court in the Scalabrini case. So the ruling is about access to a fair asylum process and protection against being returned to danger without a proper assessment. It is not an open-border ruling. The Court also criticised the state for making sweeping, unsupported claims linking Afghan and Bangladeshi asylum seekers to human trafficking, warning that such claims risked promoting prejudice against refugees.
- Sep 14, 2026
Snap 🤭😅 https://t.co/fzqwa6fFOY
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 167 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.083%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 2.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 174K interactions, about 1043x its own typical post.
- What is Kgoshi Ya Lebowa's engagement rate on X?
- Kgoshi Ya Lebowa (@Mothematiks) has an engagement rate of 0.083%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 200,843 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.083%, Kgoshi Ya Lebowa sits above the 25th percentile of the 208,041 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Mothematiks have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Mothematiks post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.87 posts per day across the measured window.