Back to @MorEdge_Insight's profile

Mor Edge Insight engagement report

@MorEdge_Insight - 262K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.082%
of 262K followers
Per impression
2.82%
7.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
206
interactions (median)
Saved
0.253%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.8/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 206 interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 2.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.4K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mor Edge Insight's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.082%, Mor Edge Insight sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 827 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 202636x their median

    The number-one orator on the globe takes the UN stage, holding up a jarring mirror to a world that refuses to see the truth. A heart-stirring sight: Bibi enters the hall, and the cowards flee. 🤣 Netanyahu looks straight ahead—primarily at the cameras, at the world—and begins his remarks without backing down. No apologies. No hanging his head. He looks straight ahead—at the hall, at the cameras, and above all at the world—and opens with sharp words: "Before I begin, if there are any more moral cowards here who haven't left the hall, please leave now." Then he looks back 14 years: "Fourteen years ago, I stood at this podium and drew a red line: I vowed to prevent Iran’s murderous dictatorship from developing nuclear bombs." Then comes the sentence that illustrates the magnitude of the decision: "Destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities was difficult. It was very hard to do. But for me, it was one of the easiest decisions I ever had to make. If we hadn't done it—we would all be dead." And he continues: "Israel is also defending many of the countries whose representatives walked out of the room." "Leaders thank us for striking Iran’s nuclear program." Then Netanyahu turns back to October 7: "On October 7—the darkest day in Israel’s history—thousands of terrorists invaded Israel." From there, he moves to the war that has been raging for three years: "Israel’s enemies expected the state to collapse—but that did not happen. We fought like lions. For three years now, we have been fighting on seven fronts." Then comes one of the speech's most powerful lines: "There is an eighth front in this war. It is the war for the truth." The war for public perception. The war for the narrative. The war for Israel’s right to tell the world what really happened here. And Netanyahu does not stop there. Here—at the speech's dramatic climax—he attacks the tyrant Erdogan for the first time: "He is a tyrant. He hosts Hamas’s terror leaders. He has slaughtered thousands of Kurdish civilians. He denies the Armenian Genocide; he imprisons journalists and opposition leaders. In fact, I think he holds the world record in that regard." And addressing the harsh accusations leveled against Israel, he says: "Despite the pain, despite the suffering, we do not surrender. Your sacrifice will not be in vain." "We will continue to defend our country." And this is perhaps the heart of the entire speech: Israel does not apologize for its very existence. Israel does not relinquish its right to defend itself. And Israel does not intend to let others write its story for it. Then Netanyahu turns his gaze to Jews around the world: "Hold your heads high. Carry yourselves with pride. Do not be afraid." Wow. A masterfully crafted speech. You might agree. You might disagree. You might argue. But it is hard to remain indifferent to a speech like this. Netanyahu on the UN stage—facing a cowardly hall, facing international criticism and the world's cameras—chooses to speak in the clearest voice possible: Israel will not stay silent. Israel will not surrender. And Israel will continue to fight for its truth. Wow, wow, quite a speech. Kudos to the Prime Minister. Remember what I am writing here. This speech will be talked about for a long time. And this speech will determine the fate of the government here. -Yoram Adri.

    5.6K1.4K3348649K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202632x their median

    This is what Britain can achieve when we lead internationally. https://t.co/LgLCwUm8z8

    3.1K5072.8K175601K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20267.2x their median

    ⚠️ WARNING: GRAPHIC RAW FOOTAGE ⚠️ This is Wafa Samir Ibrahim al-Biss, from Jabalia, walking toward the hospital that kept her alive with about twenty pounds of explosives sewn into her clothes. In late 2004, a gas canister blew in her home and burned her badly. Israel took her into Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba, treated the wounds, and sent her home with permits to come back for more care. In June 2005 she used those same papers to try to get through the Erez Crossing. Al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, the armed wing of Fatah (Mahmoud Abbas’s group), had given her three targets to choose from… a bus, a cafe, or the hospital and doctors that had treated her. She chose the hospital. She later said she wanted to kill dozens of people there, INCLUDING CHILDREN. Guards noticed her awkward walk. They pulled her aside, so she yanked the detonator. But it failed to detonate. Sappers later blew the belt in a controlled explosion. The IDF arrested her at the Erez Crossing, and a military court gave her twelve years. Then Palestinian television did what it always does with these people. It praised her. It thanked her for the sacrifice. It thanked her for wanting Jews dead. In 2011 Hamas traded hostage Gilad Shalit for more than a thousand prisoners. Yahya Sinwar walked out in that deal. So did she. The next day children were brought to her house in northern Gaza. She told them she hoped they would walk the same path, and that Allah willing some of them would become martyrs. The kids cheered. She said the button had failed at the last second and she was sorry she had not been martyred. Years later she was still saying she would do it again in a minute, that she had almost tasted paradise, and that killing Jews at the hospital that saved her was her calling. That is who came home in the Shalit deal. Not a girl who made a terrible mistake. A woman the society sent, celebrated, and then handed back to the same children. Watch the video. This isn’t resistance. That’s a patient trying to murder her doctors who saved her and as many civilians and children as possible, and a Palestinian society calling it holiness. H/T Anthony Lee for the translation.

    1.0K364453960K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20265.8x their median

    1/ 🧵🧵🧵 In 1970, archaeologists digging the ancient synagogue at Ein Gedi opened the Holy Ark and found what looked like a lump of charcoal. It had been a scroll. Fire had collapsed it into something you could not touch without turning it to powder, and for 45 years it sat in a lab unread because opening it would have been the same as destroying it. The video on slide 3 of this thread will blow your mind.

    1.0K16419973K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20254.6x their median

    It's difficult to create a new State 🧵 1. That's why The Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States (1933) establishes four legal criteria for statehood: (1) a permanent population, (2) a defined territory, (3) a government, and (4) the capacity to enter into relations with other states.

    712170252033K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.4x their median

    Nihad Awad, the national director of CAIR, told the room they may end up with about fifty members of Congress in the next six years. Then he explained what the number is for. Dismantling the system of injustice, in his words, means replacing it with the people who represent the Prophet. He didn’t say represent a district nor did he say represent the Constitution. He said represent the Prophet. That isn’t a civil-rights pitch. That is a recruitment target attached to a replacement project, delivered in English, to an audience that already clearly understands it. They aren’t even hiding the intention. The only remaining question is why so many people in Washington still pretend they didn’t hear it. H/T @AmyMek @RAIRFoundation

    466343584111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.4x their median

    1/ 🧵🧵🧵 This is an IMMENSELY IMPORTANT thread for you all to read. This is REAL history, the history that too many try to hide away and nefariously revise. We’ve all heard the propaganda from the haters that bunch of Jewish Zionists in Eastern Europe simply woke up one day in 1897, formed a movement, then spent the next fifty years manipulating the entire world into “stealing” Arab land. That’s the version the haters sell. But it’s just NOT TRUE. The real history is much older, far stranger, and a lot less convenient for that narrative.

    337122182131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.3x their median

    Wish all my fellow Jews on X and around the world Shabbat Shalom and Chag Sukkot Sameach https://t.co/3SbzalL0RM

    376722647.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    1/ 🧵🧵🧵 ATTENTION AMERICANS Most Americans only remember 9/11 when they think about the World Trade Center. That’s understandable. But eight years earlier, on a cold Friday in February, PALESTINIAN terrorists already tried to bring the towers down. Here are the details of the 1993 bombing of the WTC by mostly Palestinian terrorists👇🏼

    24411012619K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.7x their median

    The UN and much of the international community is still trying to force a two-state solution on Israel. It has been a failed policy for seventy-eight years because the Muslim Arabs wouldn’t take the state they were offered and don’t accept that Israel exists. Now let’s look at the first two-state solution the world actually forced into being. British India was carved up and Pakistan was handed a huge share of land that had been Indian land for thousands of years. Can you imagine that? Muslims given land that they’re not indigenous to and taking it away from the indigenous peoples. That “solution” produced war after war after war. It produced terrorism as state policy. It produced a nuclear standoff that still sits on a hair trigger. And today, at the United Nations, Pakistan’s prime minister stood at the podium and said any move by India on the Indus waters would be treated as an act of war. There are two patterns here. The first is that partition does not civilize a movement that rejects the other side’s right to live. It simply gives that movement a flag, an army, and a microphone. The UN should stay the hell out of the business of inventing countries for people who have spent a century proving they will not live in peace beside their neighbors. A two-state map didn’t create peace. The second pattern is that the Arab and Muslim states that keep demanding more land from non Muslim countries are, with depressing regularity, authoritarian, corrupt, hostile to women and minorities, and structurally incapable of living like normal countries. They become nests for terrorism, death and war. How can the world be so utterly stupid to try to push for another two state solution when the first one they created is such a mess? And there’s another common denominator in all this aside from Muslims. And that’s Britain. Which itself is ironic since Britain is well down the road of giving its own land away to Muslims as well.

    257701677.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 206 interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.3K times each, and 2.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.79% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.4K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Mor Edge Insight's engagement rate on X?
Mor Edge Insight (@MorEdge_Insight) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,251 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.082%, Mor Edge Insight sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MorEdge_Insight have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MorEdge_Insight post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going