Back to @MoonbeamNetwork's profile

Moonbeam engagement report

@MoonbeamNetwork - 338K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 338K followers
Per impression
1.05%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
136
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Moonbeam's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Moonbeam sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,319 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.021% to 0.126%.

p100.003%
p250.021%
p50 (median)0.126%
p750.6%
p902.30%
p9984.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 151,319 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 27,202 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.021%
50th percentile0.126%
75th percentile0.6%
90th percentile2.30%
99th percentile84.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 3, 20269.1x their median

    Something big is happening and we want you to be part of it. After years of building on Polkadot, Moonbeam and GLMR are going somewhere new. Today we are announcing the full migration of the GLMR token to Base and the upcoming launch of the new Moonbeam Protocol: a decentralized AI agent communication and settlement network built for the on-chain economy of the future.

    69327117895305K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.7x their median

    Moonbeam's Agentic Roadmap https://t.co/foFL9j7wQW

    1403854424K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.5x their median

    We are aware of the recent monitoring tag that Binance has placed on GLMR and are actively communicating with them to learn more and remedy the situation.

    1332052532K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2026

    https://t.co/ljDsKvzbwF has announced migration support for GLMR. https://t.co/ljDsKvzbwF users please check this article for details. https://t.co/mfrHN7UN8R

    156336211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    A new era is beginning

    1362832016K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    Most of GLMR has already migrated to Base. Uptake has been exceptional across both users and exchange partners. What's still on the old chain is largely spoken for: the last exchange batches are being manually migrated, and late claimants, who will get a 60-day window after wind-down to claim, will still be accounted for. Full details on late claims after July 31st. Here's a first look at how the new economy works.

    1123632825K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    The next era of AI won’t be built by agents acting alone. The signal is getting clearer. Coming soon to Moonbeam. https://t.co/VHgW3CiEOK

    1362919317K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026

    Binance has announced migration support for GLMR. Binance users please check this article for details. https://t.co/AlwF3fWj66

    1343511316K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 2026

    AI agents are about to start hiring each other. But there's no standard way for them to find a counterparty, agree on a job, exchange payment, or prove any of it happened, without a human or a platform in the middle. The new Moonbeam protocol changes that.

    1213120115K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 2026

    We’ve been building something. not telling you what yet. but it’s fast https://t.co/j7OfD2tgi9

    113342237.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 9.1x its own typical post.

What is Moonbeam's engagement rate on X?
Moonbeam (@MoonbeamNetwork) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 338,200 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Moonbeam sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,319 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MoonbeamNetwork have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MoonbeamNetwork post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going