Back to @MoonPaxi's profile

MoonPaxi中国金兔🐇 engagement report

@MoonPaxi - 203K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 203K followers
Per impression
0.367%
8.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
30
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 203K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 0.367% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 111 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MoonPaxi中国金兔🐇's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, MoonPaxi中国金兔🐇 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 536 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 9, 20263.7x their median

    最近,#PIZZA 正在重新成为市场关注的焦点。@PizzaBTCB 经历前期充分调整之后,PIZZA 并没有失去市场热度,反而开始逐渐找回上涨节奏。价格在关键区域持续获得支撑,每一次回调之后都能够看到新的买盘出现,说明市场承接能力依然强劲,整体结构也正在一步步恢复。 0x8554D38b95E4F7Ca11D391008627Df30B2b07777 真正让我期待的,是 PIZZA 目前展现出的这种韧性。相比短时间内突然拉升然后迅速回落的项目,PIZZA 更像是在上涨与整理之间不断积累力量。随着交易活跃度逐渐提高,市场参与者重新增加,价格重心也开始慢慢抬升,这种持续改善的结构值得重点关注。 更重要的是,社区热度也正在重新升温。越来越多市场参与者开始重新关注 PIZZA,而价格表现与市场参与度同步改善,也让这个项目重新获得了更多讨论空间。 如果后续能够继续守住关键支撑,并在下一次上攻过程中迎来更强的资金推动,那么 PIZZA 或许有机会进一步挑战前期高点,并打开新的想象空间。 很多时候,真正值得关注的机会,并不是出现在最疯狂的时候,而是在经历调整之后重新展现力量的那一刻。而现在的 PIZZA,正在释放越来越多积极信号。 市场已经开始重新注意到它,接下来,就看 PIZZA 能否把这股重新聚集起来的动能转化为下一阶段的突破。PIZZA 的下一轮行情,值得期待。

    50106011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.4x their median

    最近 $VAULT 的存在感正在明显回升,而真正让我重新关注它的,并不只是价格层面的变化,更是它背后正在逐渐展现出来的独特机制。 相比普通 Meme 项目,PonsVault V2 给 VAULT 加入了更加清晰的生态闭环。创作者费用可以通过自动化机制用于回购、销毁或奖励,让项目的市场活动与生态价值之间形成更直接的连接。 用户参与增加 → 交易活跃度提升 → 费用持续产生 → 回购、销毁与奖励机制进一步运转。 这种机制让 VAULT 不只是依靠市场情绪推动叙事,而是拥有一个可以持续发展的玩法。对于 Meme 市场来说,一个能够不断制造话题,同时又具备自身机制特色的项目,往往更容易形成长期记忆点。 更值得关注的是,VAULT 正在重新获得市场参与者的注意。曾经被市场忽略的项目,一旦重新聚集流动性与社区关注,往往会出现完全不同的故事线。PonsVault V2 现在所展现出的潜力,确实让人很难忽视。 如果后续交易活跃度继续提升,社区进一步扩大,VAULT 的回购、销毁以及奖励机制能够持续运转,那么这个项目或许正在进入一个全新的阶段。市场曾经暂时忘记过 VAULT,但现在,它正在重新回到聚光灯下。 CA: 0xFdae23CE76018Da62507bB5ef20e6ef5450e8312

    5096014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.3x their median

    最近 Robinhood Chain 的 Stock Meme 赛道越来越有意思,而 solana:9uT7rob8TKKnzvxqkD5nj9UMw16ZPJByEW37pMcHpump 绝对是其中值得重点关注的一个。@iCoinRH AAPL × Meme 的组合本身就拥有极强的认知度,而 IC0IN 更吸引人的地方,是它不仅有清晰的叙事,还有持续活跃的社区和稳定的持有者基础。 更重要的是,团队并没有只停留在讲故事,而是在持续产出内容、运营社区并推动项目发展。对于 Meme 来说,真正能够长期留住市场注意力的,往往就是品牌辨识度、社区凝聚力以及团队持续执行的能力。 随着 Robinhood Chain 的 Stock Meme 叙事持续升温,ICOIN 已经具备了非常鲜明的赛道定位。如果后续社区热度、交易活跃度和项目执行力继续保持,这个项目完全有机会成为 Stock Meme 板块中更具代表性的名字之一。 好的叙事正在形成,社区也在不断壮大。ICOIN 现在或许还只是故事的早期阶段,但这样的项目,确实值得提前放进观察名单。 CA: 0x5d6EF090a1461B11c9427aC319260122D1C61e18

    509506.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.3x their median

    如果要在 Robinhood 生态中寻找一个自带故事、认知度和文化属性的 Meme,那么 $YOLO 绝对值得被重新关注。@yolorobinhood_ 0x62C71cd34a52c30d894419CBcc55Db2aFA8032eA YOLO 最特别的地方,并不是依靠复杂叙事吸引市场,而是它本身就拥有极其简单、容易理解的核心理念:You Only Live Once. “人生只有一次”,代表着敢于冒险、抓住机会、相信自己的选择。 而这种精神与交易文化天然契合,也让 YOLO 拥有了其他 Meme 很难复制的品牌辨识度。更值得注意的是,很多 Meme 的热度往往随着市场周期快速消退,但 YOLO 即使经历低迷阶段,依然保持着一定的认知度和讨论基础。这说明它并不是一个完全依赖短期行情存在的 Meme,而是已经形成了一定的文化记忆。 现在真正值得期待的,是这种已有认知能否进一步转化为更强的社区参与。随着 Robinhood 生态持续发展,越来越多交易者重新关注 Meme 文化,如果 YOLO 再次成为市场讨论的焦点,那么这个经典叙事完全有机会迎来属于自己的第二次机会。 很多时候,真正强大的 Meme 并不需要创造一个全新的故事。它只需要在正确的时间,让一个大家早已熟悉的故事重新焕发生命力。而 YOLO 恰恰拥有这样的基础。 一个简单的名字,一个深入交易文化的理念,再加上 Robinhood 生态不断扩大的想象空间,这些因素正在让 YOLO 的下一篇章变得越来越值得期待。YOLO 的故事还远没有结束。也许下一次市场重新点燃 Meme 热潮时,这个经典叙事会再次站到聚光灯下。

    7190012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20263.3x their median

    如果要在新一轮 Stock Meme 叙事中寻找一个辨识度足够高的项目,#MarsCoin 绝对是一个值得重点关注的名字。@MarsCoin7777 0xFe189E97832DA1573e4e4Ff034F4fFC3a15c7777 相比普通 Meme 仅仅依靠短期情绪推动,$MarsCoin 正在逐渐建立属于自己的独特叙事。从 Binance Alpha、SPCX 生态,到近期持续升温的 Stock Meme 与 RWA 方向,它正在多个热门叙事的交汇点上不断扩大自己的影响力。 真正让我看好它的,是 MarsCoin 并没有停留在过去的市场表现,而是在持续强化自己的品牌定位。随着越来越多用户开始认识 Stock Meme 这一新兴赛道,MarsCoin 的市场辨识度与社区影响力也有望进一步提升。 更值得期待的是,围绕这一叙事仍然存在大量潜在催化空间。未来随着生态不断发展、社区持续扩大,以及 Stock Meme 和 RWA 获得更多市场关注,MarsCoin 依然拥有非常丰富的想象空间。 市场真正的龙头,往往不是在所有人都已经发现之后才出现,而是在新叙事刚刚形成的时候,就已经开始积累自己的品牌和社区。而 MarsCoin 现在正在做的,正是这件事。 如果 Stock Meme 赛道迎来下一轮大规模关注,MarsCoin 有机会凭借独特的定位成为其中极具代表性的项目之一。故事还远没有结束,真正值得期待的,或许正是接下来的阶段。

    8090010.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.1x their median

    如果说 Brainrot 赛道一直在寻找能够让社区真正参与其中的故事,那么 solana:J8PSdNP3QewKq2Z1JJJFDMaqF7KcaiJhR7gbr5KZpump 无疑正在走出一条非常特别的路线。@TripleTsol TRIPLET 最吸引人的地方,并不只是一个简单的 Meme 概念,而是它正在把一个持续发展的故事,逐渐转化为具有凝聚力的社区行动。 目前距离即将到来的庭审仅剩 18 天,围绕 TRIPLET 的讨论热度仍在持续升温。更值得注意的是,已有 500 万枚代币被锁定,CT 社区规模也从约 1000 人增长至接近 2000 人,这种持续扩大的参与度,让整个叙事变得更加有生命力。 J8PSdNP3QewKq2Z1JJJFDMaqF7KcaiJhR7gbr5KZpump 对于 Meme 项目而言,一个能够不断产生新话题、持续吸引社区参与的故事,本身就是非常重要的竞争力。而 TRIPLET 恰好拥有一个清晰的时间节点,随着庭审日期逐渐临近,未来几周也可能成为社区进一步扩张和叙事持续发酵的重要阶段。 社区增长 + 持续关注 + 事件驱动叙事。这些元素正在不断叠加,让 TRIPLET 在 Brainrot 赛道中形成了相当鲜明的辨识度。 距离关键节点还有 18 天,故事仍在继续,社区也仍在扩大。对于喜欢关注早期 Meme 叙事的人来说,TRIPLET 绝对值得放进观察名单。真正有意思的 Meme,从来不只是一个 Ticker,而是能够让越来越多人参与其中的故事。TRIPLET 的下一章,正在逐渐展开。

    3126019.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.0x their median

    经历前期一轮强势上涨后, zzz-2:native 目前正在高位完成新的蓄势,而这种走势反而让它更值得关注。 前期快速上行已经证明市场对 ZZZ 的关注度,而近期进入震荡整理后,价格依然能够维持在相对高位。每次回调都有买盘承接,说明市场并没有因为短期波动而完全失去信心。 更值得注意的是,调整过程中 ZZZ 正逐渐形成新的价格区间,并多次尝试向上突破。相比单纯依靠一次拉升吸引眼球,这种高位换手、反复确认支撑的表现,反而更容易为下一阶段行情积累力量。 对于 Meme 来说,真正漂亮的结构并不是永远上涨,而是在上涨之后能够稳住、消化抛压,并重新聚集市场关注。 目前 ZZZ 正处于一个值得观察的关键阶段。如果后续买盘进一步增强,成交活跃度重新放大,并成功突破当前压力区域,那么市场情绪或许会再次被点燃。 高位不跌,回调有承接,突破仍在酝酿。ZZZ 目前展现出的市场韧性相当亮眼,下一次真正突破时,或许会成为市场重新聚焦的时刻。 CA: 0x7dbf38976f6D3b9c529e7D9484A71898B409eE6a

    2906019.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.8x their median

    最近,#WOJAK 的盘面正在进入一个非常值得关注的蓄力阶段。@defnotwojak 0xaCE55FE98Bab14366dD49aB5AA5dF76aA11A3c6f 经历前期持续上涨并成功突破关键阻力之后,WOJAK 已经证明了自身强劲的市场吸引力。虽然突破后的行情伴随着较大的波动,但价格始终能够维持在相对强势的区域,说明市场关注度和参与热情依然在线。现在最有意思的地方来了。 经过前期快速上涨之后,WOJAK 开始进入高位整理阶段。很多人看到横盘可能会认为行情失去动力,但从另一个角度来看,这更像是一次充分换手与重新蓄势的过程。上涨需要消化获利盘,强势项目也需要通过整理建立新的价格基础。 如果 WOJAK 能够在当前区域继续稳住,并随着市场情绪回暖重新吸引买盘,那么一旦突破目前的整理区间,后续行情或许会再次迎来新的想象空间。我反而更加关注这种突破之后的高位蓄势。 因为真正强势的项目,并不是永远快速上涨,而是上涨之后依然能够守住结构,并在市场重新聚集力量时再次寻找突破机会。目前,WOJAK 正处于一个非常关键的位置。 盘整是在等待方向,而不是故事结束。如果下一轮买盘重新回归,WOJAK 能否再次突破前方压力,将成为市场关注的焦点。蓄势已久,下一次行情或许正在酝酿。

    2083010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.8x their median

    如果最近正在关注 Solana Meme 赛道,那么 $LICKINGCAT 绝对是一个值得放进观察名单的名字。@worldlickingcat EjD5Y9NVhXmtEqU7wYvAyZvDWZFQeEuHXFatJmTbpump 它最吸引人的地方,并不只是“猫 Meme”本身,而是目前已经展现出的链上关注度与早期叙事潜力。Solana 上的 Meme 竞争一直非常激烈,能够在早期就形成独特记忆点,并持续吸引市场注意,本身就是一种优势。 尤其值得关注的是,LICKINGCAT 背后的链上数据仍处于不断演变的阶段。对于早期 Meme 来说,资金流向、持币人数、交易活跃度以及流动性变化,往往比短期价格波动更加重要。 如果这些核心指标能够持续改善,社区规模不断扩大,同时市场讨论度进一步升温,那么 LICKINGCAT 的故事无疑会拥有更大的传播空间。 我更喜欢这种仍然处于早期、市场共识尚未完全形成的项目。 当然,Meme 市场本身具有极高波动性,而且同名 Token 可能不止一个,因此在关注 LICKINGCAT 时,一定要核实官方渠道与准确合约地址,不要仅凭名称或 ticker 进行交易。Solana 上确实存在多个相似的猫主题 Token,公开市场数据也显示不同代币之间的流动性可能存在巨大差异。 但从 Meme 文化、社区传播以及早期链上叙事来看,LICKINGCAT 依然是一个值得持续观察的项目。 真正有意思的 Meme,往往不是等所有人都发现之后才开始关注,而是在早期就逐渐积累自己的社区与文化。LICKINGCAT 的故事还在展开,接下来就看它能否把早期关注转化为更强的社区共识。

    10270110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.7x their median

    最近 $MADE 的市场表现越来越有意思了。@SelfMadebySP3ND 经历前期较长时间的沉淀与整理之后,MADE 迎来了明显的资金回流,价格快速走强的同时,交易活跃度也同步提升,市场关注度明显升温。 真正让我看好它的,是这波上涨之后依然保持着不错的市场热度。快速拉升过后,MADE 并没有直接失去活跃度,而是在高位持续进行筹码交换,价格保持在相对强势的区域。这意味着市场正在重新寻找新的平衡,同时也给后续行情留下了更多想象空间。 对于 Meme 项目来说,能够从长期沉寂中重新获得资金与社区关注,本身就是一个非常值得重视的信号。MADE 目前已经成功重新回到市场视野,而随着更多交易者开始关注这个项目,后续的关注度仍有机会进一步提升。 如果接下来买盘再次增强,成交量持续放大,并成功突破前方压力区域,那么 MADE 或许会迎来下一阶段更加精彩的表现。从沉淀到突破,再到高位蓄势,MADE 正在一步一步建立自己的市场存在感。这个故事,可能还远没有结束。 CA: EpXtn6xGoZ4Y45vRjiDUHSCGbBoJD5FaEqZbF98YswH1

    21457013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 203K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.0K times each, and 0.367% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 111 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is MoonPaxi中国金兔🐇's engagement rate on X?
MoonPaxi中国金兔🐇 (@MoonPaxi) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 203,019 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, MoonPaxi中国金兔🐇 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MoonPaxi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MoonPaxi post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going