Back to @MoneyGram's profile

MoneyGram engagement report

@MoneyGram - 246K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 246K followers
Per impression
1.54%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.112%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 1.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #crosstechworld2026, #nyselive.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #crosstechworld2026, #nyselive.

Compared with accounts its own size

MoneyGram's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, MoneyGram sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 249 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 2, 202619x their median

    Introducing MGUSD. MoneyGram's native U.S. dollar stablecoin. Natively issued on @StellarOrg. Built with @Stablecoin, @M0 and @FireblocksHQ. Live in the U.S. today. https://t.co/GWW3XtNrf6

    1.3K33572106252K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202618x their median

    Five years back, we started building on the @StellarOrg network. Today, we help power it. 🚨 MoneyGram is now a Tier 1 validator on Stellar. Bringing decades of payments expertise, global trust and compliance leadership to the future of money movement. https://t.co/t3ppG8eYwz

    1.4K322403582K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202617x their median

    Global stablecoin payroll. Local currency cashouts. Worldwide. 🌎 Zebec and @MoneyGram are expanding enterprise payroll with MoneyGram Ramps, connecting Zebec’s payroll experience on the @StellarOrg network with MoneyGram’s global network of 480K+ retail locations across 170+ countries and territories. Employees and contractors can receive stablecoin payroll and access their earnings in local currency through participating MoneyGram locations.

    1.2K3194042127K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.9x their median

    Great products are built with great partners @raincards provides the card infrastructure. @crossmint powers the wallet layer. @StellarOrg provides the blockchain infrastructure. Thank you to all three teams for helping bring the MG Card to life 🤝 https://t.co/sQeUzXAbr4

    43910520517K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20264.5x their median

    @StellarOrg has been foundational to our blockchain journey: ✔️ Early innovation partner for blockchain-powered global money movement. ✔️ First blockchain to power MoneyGram Ramps at global scale. ✔️ Exclusive blockchain behind our consumer stable digital dollar balance.

    3485620853K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.5x their median

    It’s a great day to be a validator. @Arc mainnet is live, and MoneyGram is supporting it from day one as a founding validator. Learn more: https://t.co/E0w9MF6wPV https://t.co/1Y1Fi0VwQD

    2744912214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.7x their median

    Why @StellarOrg for MGUSD? MoneyGram has worked with @StellarOrg for 5+ years. So, when it came time to choose the network for MGUSD, we had a pretty good history to draw from. CEO @AnthonySoohoo breaks down the answer with @YellowMedia_HQ. 👇 https://t.co/Zxje0tPazM

    209417515K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.5x their median

    Receiving money instantly >>>>>>> Receiving money in 3 days

    1882322310K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.0x their median

    The consumer always comes first. The MoneyGram Card brings together MoneyGram, @raincards, @StellarOrg and @crossmint around one goal: making what happens after the money arrives more useful. @AnthonySoohoo explains on @BloombergTV 👇 https://t.co/19aO1a45q5

    151316211K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20261.9x their median

    The next generation of money movement is being built right now. @LukeTuttle2049 on what becoming a Tier 1 validator on @StellarOrg means for MoneyGram 👇 https://t.co/20YnJRJW52

    152266324K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#crosstechworld2026#nyselive

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 246K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 1.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #crosstechworld2026, #nyselive.

What is MoneyGram's engagement rate on X?
MoneyGram (@MoneyGram) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,901 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, MoneyGram sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MoneyGram have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MoneyGram post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going