Back to @MoneyCrptBunny's profile

Money Bunny engagement report

@MoneyCrptBunny - 279K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.073%
of 279K followers
Per impression
1.17%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
6.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
204
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 204 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 920 interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Money Bunny's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.073%, Money Bunny sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 276 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20264.5x their median

    Meta planned for AI to take over much of the daily work performed by thousands of human employees, and executives explored slashing the size of many teams by up to 60%. Just hours before the first layoff wave, the CEO blinked. Katie Paul reports https://t.co/5QUlsrMNHb https://t.co/MVYwscy48G

    6891883013256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.0x their median

    https://t.co/YFYfRgI0SU

    3463825946K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.9x their median

    People who actively invest in solo founders: - @julianweisser + @_guglielmo (Solo Founders Program, $100k checks) - @aridutilh + @FedericoNoemie (Solo Grants, $1k grants) - @jmj (Chapter One Ventures) - @patmatthews (Active Capital) - @brettcalhounn (Redbud VC) - @CindyXBi (CapitalX) - @EricJorgenson - @JoshConstine (SignalFire) - @bentossell - @alexfmac (Sequel) - @joshu - @ColinGardiner (Yonder Ventures) - @crapshoot101 (POV Ventures) - @MindaBrusse (First Row Partners) - @hyperdima (Hyperstition VC) - @jan_olsson (Extantia) - @TheRealMcHoy (Mordecai Seed)

    3272431627K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.5x their median

    A simple rule. Buy on dip and sell on pump. Right now is the perfect time to add $DEALER into your bag. https://t.co/TNUXaomp2L

    2253943119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    https://t.co/Nnmve4MnOX

    2481923826K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Fading $DEALER here is midcurve risk. When liquidity holds firm through local chop and diamond hands lock in supply, the next leg up doesn't give polite entry pullbacks. The same dev who sent $NORMIE to $27M has the playbook ready. https://t.co/vvBsY8BsNV

    1954348310K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Accumulating $DEALER at these levels is a total no-brainer. The deployer tied to this is the exact same dev who pushed $NORMIE to a $27M peak, meaning the capital, exchange connections, and market making are already locked in. With CEX listings creeping up on the horizon, this next leg up is going to send it flying.

    1593850413K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Every meme faces the exact same test. After running to $7M+ on Day 1 with MEXC and LBank listings, $WOOF's first drawdown is the exact consolidation phase where weak hands exit and real conviction forms. Just like $TOSHI shaking out from $30M down to $2M before expanding toward $1B, surviving severe volatility is required to capture the real upside. That price is a discount for us.

    217825020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Before the animal meta took over, $BUDDY's provenance was already permanently etched into Bitcoin. Now that historical lineage is driving real-world impact. With 47 abused animals rescued from horrific conditions and an official invitation to ARC's Nashville center, $BUDDY is proving what real cultural utility looks like. Ca: 7MYegHoqDGhWdvrnxeuiAEndgG6qcs1N3W5v6SXspump

    1971822218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    $BOW is real, the actual credit layer for the Robinhood chain, letting people borrow against tokenized stocks without selling them. Surging nearly 40% in under 24 hours to approach $700K TVL, the capital inflows into ethereum:0x07f5b6823751c2e2cd4560f28af75ff887102241’s flagship lending protocol are accelerating fast. With ethereum:0x07f5b6823751c2e2cd4560f28af75ff887102241 pushing toward the $0.60 level, the broader ecosystem valuation is primed for a heavy upward reprice. Ca: 0x451b42A15100C340CA12F7c66DE06fac5EA2D751

    202327123K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 204 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.073%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 920 interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

What is Money Bunny's engagement rate on X?
Money Bunny (@MoneyCrptBunny) has an engagement rate of 0.073%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 278,793 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.073%, Money Bunny sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MoneyCrptBunny have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MoneyCrptBunny post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going