Back to @MisterSalesman's profile

M LeMont engagement report

@MisterSalesman - 396K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 396K followers
Per impression
1.78%
731 views on a typical post
Reach
0.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0.137%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 731 times each, and 1.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.185% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 62% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 649x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #amazonaffiliate, #paidlink2000.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #amazonaffiliate, #paidlink2000.

Compared with accounts its own size

M LeMont's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, M LeMont sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 2026649x their median

    They kicked the ball straight at her… she scored a free-kick from the spot. ⚽🔥 https://t.co/nUcOJaSlbx

    7.7K475212362.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026294x their median

    ⚰️ These funerals are insane! “GO ON BABY!” Black excellence ✊🏿 https://t.co/NTorSeTaFW

    2.8K391473167365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026190x their median

    लड़की को मगरमच्छ ने खिंचा लेकिन उसकी जान बच गई https://t.co/sQ8TRaPtQj

    2.1K218125123.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202623x their median

    A ROBOT IS COOKING DINNER. 🤖🍳 AND THIS IS NO LONGER SCIENCE FICTION. It picks up ingredients, handles kitchen equipment, and follows a sequence of tasks — almost like a human in the kitchen. The most interesting part isn’t the food itself. It’s the robot’s ability to understand its surroundings, recognize objects, and execute a sequence of actions to achieve a real-world result. Not long ago, we were watching humanoid robots simply walk. Now they’re starting to cook our dinner. The question is no longer “Can they do it?” It’s “How fast will they become part of our homes?” 🚀

    19647461119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202621x their median

    Imagine paying $80K for a humanoid robot and it can't even cook you dinner.. https://t.co/cFf6jn1bBz

    18839311467K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20232.9x their median

    https://t.co/KL4RlvaMS3 Do we have a deal Mr LeMont? Pancakes for your book, How To Gain 100,000 Twitter Followers. “It is a vault of possibilities unleashed through a simple click" We have a Deal! Available on Amazon Paperback & Ebook. #KindleUnlimited #AuthorsOfTwitter

    2691214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20261.8x their median

    https://t.co/KIwnWCc298

    13137510K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    “When you’re learning something new that’s the worst you will ever be. Don’t quit. You can only get better.” Project Delta 2: Hybrid Trading — Now Available https://t.co/orz0H9C3mY https://t.co/Y1MszwOJnW

    10210731 viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Blue Light Special: $7.99 Limited Time Only https://t.co/8hL9EJcF9R

    2000277 viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Blue Light Special: $7.99 Limited Time Only https://t.co/8hL9EJdcZp https://t.co/sdTMkGI4qF

    2000279 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#amazonaffiliate#paidlink2000

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 396K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 731 times each, and 1.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.185% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 62% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.4K interactions, about 649x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #amazonaffiliate, #paidlink2000.

What is M LeMont's engagement rate on X?
M LeMont (@MisterSalesman) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 396,112 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, M LeMont sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MisterSalesman have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MisterSalesman post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going