Back to @MissExquisite_'s profile

FREAK NASTY πŸ‘…πŸ˜ˆ NJ 10/23-26πŸ“πŸ’¦ engagement report

@MissExquisite_ - 591K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 591K followers
Per impression
0.242%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.17/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 591K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.242% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 179x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #longlivepimp, #mlb, #nhl.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #longlivepimp, #mlb, #nhl.

Compared with accounts its own size

FREAK NASTY πŸ‘…πŸ˜ˆ NJ 10/23-26πŸ“πŸ’¦'s engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, FREAK NASTY πŸ‘…πŸ˜ˆ NJ 10/23-26πŸ“πŸ’¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video14% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 2026179x their median

    Would you pull out or nut in me? πŸ’¦πŸ₯œ https://t.co/cwpZBxICdk

    2.9K951875110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026109x their median

    A gag reflex don’t stop shit 🀀 I’m tryna swallow that dick πŸ‘…πŸ’¦ https://t.co/gQua2P2Vni

    1.7K65634876K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202618x their median

    It’s that time again πŸ₯³ The Fan Nominations for the 2027 @avnawards are OPEN πŸ“¨ Please go nominate me for: πŸ† Favorite BBW Star ⭐️ Just type my name & select me from the list πŸ’– Stage Name: Miss Exquisite X Handle: @MissExquisite_ πŸ”—: https://t.co/PIBMy3aUal https://t.co/jvrfVAQUnh

    2061729299K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.6x their median

    Went to the Chocolate Factory & ate the biggest bar I could find πŸ˜‹ @chocolategod310 🍫 Dropping this Friday πŸ₯΅ you don’t wanna miss this one πŸ”₯ https://t.co/YZJrz0apP4

    156267125K viewsView on X
  • Dec 12, 20254.5x their median

    I know a big dick loves to see me coming 😍😏🀀

    94181843.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.1x their median

    Yall do not like BBWS fr 😭 idk why I believed yall in the first place πŸ₯±

    59622413K viewsView on X
  • Feb 22, 20262.9x their median

    When I call you for some dick, you better bring it to me πŸ™‚β€β†”οΈπŸ₯΅πŸ”₯

    6531631.2M viewsView on X
  • Feb 6, 20262.9x their median

    Don’t invite me over if I can’t have that dick when I get there 😌😏😈

    666961.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.6x their median

    Who’s up? πŸ‘€ Are all the freaks sleep? πŸ₯Ί

    45110113K viewsView on X
  • Jan 2, 20261.7x their median

    There’s nothing that turns me on more than slurping & creaming on a dick I know I shouldn’t be fucking πŸ₯°πŸ˜πŸ€«

    416211.5M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#longlivepimp#mlb#nhl#xmas

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 591K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.242% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 179x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #longlivepimp, #mlb, #nhl.

What is FREAK NASTY πŸ‘…πŸ˜ˆ NJ 10/23-26πŸ“πŸ’¦'s engagement rate on X?
FREAK NASTY πŸ‘…πŸ˜ˆ NJ 10/23-26πŸ“πŸ’¦ (@MissExquisite_) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 591,100 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, FREAK NASTY πŸ‘…πŸ˜ˆ NJ 10/23-26πŸ“πŸ’¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MissExquisite_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MissExquisite_ post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going