FREAK NASTY π π NJ 10/23-26ππ¦ engagement report
@MissExquisite_ - 591K followers on X
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 591K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.242% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 179x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #longlivepimp, #mlb, #nhl.
Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #longlivepimp, #mlb, #nhl.
Compared with accounts its own size
FREAK NASTY π π NJ 10/23-26ππ¦'s engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, FREAK NASTY π π NJ 10/23-26ππ¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 14% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 10, 2026179x their median
Would you pull out or nut in me? π¦π₯ https://t.co/cwpZBxICdk
- Sep 1, 2026109x their median
A gag reflex donβt stop shit π€€ Iβm tryna swallow that dick π π¦ https://t.co/gQua2P2Vni
- Sep 2, 202618x their median
Itβs that time again π₯³ The Fan Nominations for the 2027 @avnawards are OPEN π¨ Please go nominate me for: π Favorite BBW Star βοΈ Just type my name & select me from the list π Stage Name: Miss Exquisite X Handle: @MissExquisite_ π: https://t.co/PIBMy3aUal https://t.co/jvrfVAQUnh
- Sep 13, 20268.6x their median
Went to the Chocolate Factory & ate the biggest bar I could find π @chocolategod310 π« Dropping this Friday π₯΅ you donβt wanna miss this one π₯ https://t.co/YZJrz0apP4
- Dec 12, 20254.5x their median
I know a big dick loves to see me coming πππ€€
- Sep 2, 20264.1x their median
Yall do not like BBWS fr π idk why I believed yall in the first place π₯±
- Feb 22, 20262.9x their median
When I call you for some dick, you better bring it to me πββοΈπ₯΅π₯
- Feb 6, 20262.9x their median
Donβt invite me over if I canβt have that dick when I get there πππ
- Aug 25, 20262.6x their median
Whoβs up? π Are all the freaks sleep? π₯Ί
- Jan 2, 20261.7x their median
Thereβs nothing that turns me on more than slurping & creaming on a dick I know I shouldnβt be fucking π₯°ππ€«
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 591K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 0.242% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 179x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #longlivepimp, #mlb, #nhl.
- What is FREAK NASTY π π NJ 10/23-26ππ¦'s engagement rate on X?
- FREAK NASTY π π NJ 10/23-26ππ¦ (@MissExquisite_) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 591,100 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, FREAK NASTY π π NJ 10/23-26ππ¦ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MissExquisite_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MissExquisite_ post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.17 posts per day across the measured window.