Back to @MisOdios's profile

Gustavo Beaverhausen engagement report

@MisOdios - 323K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.32%
of 323K followers
Per impression
5.20%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
6.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 323K followers, an engagement rate of 0.32%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 5.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gustavo Beaverhausen's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.32%, Gustavo Beaverhausen sits above the 50th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,576 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,420 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video9% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 9% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 240 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 202611x their median

    Que no se pierda jamás esa bonita costumbre argentina de decirle a alguien “tu amigo” para referirte a otra persona que a ambos les cae como el orto, como si fuese una afrenta en sí misma estar vinculado (aunque sea tangencialmente) con el susodicho.

    10K7416339146K viewsView on X
  • Jun 22, 20264.5x their median

    Lo que más me gusta de las conferencias de Scaloni, a falta de verba y facundia, es que ni se gasta en disimular que los periodistas le parecen unos pelotudos.

    4.4K19016652K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20264.3x their median

    Lo que más bronca me da es que mientras acá inventaban teorías pelotudísimas, el mejor jugador de fútbol del mundo lo único que quería era ganarle a la biología y que el papá lo llamara por teléfono para decirle que había jugado bien a la pelota.

    4.0K35216654K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20263.3x their median

    Adorni esperó a que arranque el Mundial para salir del clóset de la delincuencia, pensando que así nos íbamos a olvidar. Justo nosotros, que a rencorosos no nos gana nadie.

    2.8K614411426K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20263.1x their median

    El método argentino: pasarla como el orto la mayor cantidad de tiempo posible hasta que las nubes se corren, te entra un rayito de sol y zafás del corchazo de puro pedo.

    2.8K30025841K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20262.8x their median

    De la “exitosa abogada” al “exitoso bitcoiner”.

    2.2K571501132K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 20262.7x their median

    La ternura de los twitteros oficialistas que dicen “No entiendo cómo Milei no le suelta la mano a Adorni”, como si este chorizo de remil mierda no fuese el eslabón más flojo de una cadena de choreo en la que participan hasta los perros muertos del neurodivergente que nos preside.

    2.2K570291626K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.5x their median

    Multa ejemplar a la amiga y/o pariente que convenció a Camila Mayan de que podía apelar a toda la maquinaria de uno de los tres poderes de la República para que la compensen económicamente porque su novio millonario la dejó de querer. ¿Bases para el reclamo? Haber abandonado una carrera inexistente para dedicarse a la crianza de, ¿qué? ¿Una Weimaraner?

    2.4K154412158K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20262.3x their median

    Y pensar que hay gente que tuvo la desgracia de no nacer en Argentina. Pobrecitos.

    2.0K4002320K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20262.3x their median

    Desde ayer están saliendo cada vez más videos viejos de Adorni diciendo que antes de comprarse un puto bitcoin prefiere cogerse el cadáver de un antepasado. Pobre hombre. Se cae de espaldas y se quiebra el pito.

    2.1K29426628K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 323K followers, an engagement rate of 0.32%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 5.20% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 9% carry an image or video and 9% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Gustavo Beaverhausen's engagement rate on X?
Gustavo Beaverhausen (@MisOdios) has an engagement rate of 0.32%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 323,220 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.32%, Gustavo Beaverhausen sits above the 50th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MisOdios have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MisOdios post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going