PlayerSells
Back to @MirrorFootball's profile

Mirror Football engagement report

@MirrorFootball - 818K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 818K followers
Per impression
0.097%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
1.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 818K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.097% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126 interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mirror Football's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Mirror Football sits above the 10th percentile of the 14,517 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.008%.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.055%
p750.358%
p902.36%
p99256.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 14,517 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 256,168 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.055%
75th percentile0.358%
90th percentile2.36%
99th percentile256.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%18K
01:00 UTC+1%18K
02:00 UTC-1%18K
03:00 UTC-4%18K
04:00 UTC-7%15K
05:00 UTC-6%14K
06:00 UTC-6%16K
07:00 UTC-6%17K
08:00 UTC-6%20K
09:00 UTC-3%23K
10:00 UTC-2%25K
11:00 UTC-2%26K
12:00 UTC0%29K
13:00 UTC0%33K
14:00 UTC-2%34K
15:00 UTC-1%36K
16:00 UTC-1%35K
17:00 UTC-1%33K
18:00 UTC+1%30K
19:00 UTC+1%28K
20:00 UTC-1%26K
21:00 UTC+1%23K
22:00 UTC+1%20K
23:00 UTC0%18K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%85K
Monday+2%88K
Tuesday+1%102K
Wednesday-3%87K
Thursday-1%82K
Friday-4%89K
Saturday+4%83K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+83%+77% to +89%7.0K
Outbound link100% of posts-48%-50% to -47%7.2K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%11K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 83% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 48% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 138 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20268.4x their median

    Arsenal news: Last-ditch Julian Alvarez transfer offer as fresh talks held to sign striker https://t.co/uGj2QDsFot

    114120023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.3x their median

    Arsenal dealt Kenan Yildiz blow as transfer hopes ended - 'They can offer whatever' https://t.co/VNJJ0ilIpk https://t.co/JwAhghlsLK

    6211024K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.4x their median

    Newcastle fans launch Alexander Isak abuse as Liverpool star returns before Premier League clash https://t.co/AuaZIzbFB6 https://t.co/amQ5cSW2DR

    3965130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.9x their median

    NEW: Man Utd target Alejandro Balde has been left out of Barcelona's squad to face Elche with a £34m bid 'being prepared' ❌ https://t.co/EM3uqTFixR https://t.co/8XGaTZ8VpR

    3652018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.6x their median

    Liverpool news: Reds discover Yankuba Minteh asking price as transfer 'likely' to happen https://t.co/QcQeb3COFp

    3612023K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.2x their median

    Jean-Philippe Mateta calls in FIFA in bid to rip up Crystal Palace contract https://t.co/bVMFFLAD76 https://t.co/FwsKAEdvlC

    2162425K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.1x their median

    🗣️ “For me, it was clear." Granit Xhaka opens up on Chelsea transfer decision after Xabi Alonso talks https://t.co/R6ZQOzOv6Q https://t.co/uzVD25vogh

    3001019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.0x their median

    'I had my Arsenal tattoo removed after turning professional - I had to stop supporting the club' https://t.co/10Vi9GjuWe

    2550022K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20261.9x their median

    💬 "The Toon Army booed Isak’s every touch and they will never forgive his treachery." ✍️ @johncrossmirror at St James's Park as Liverpool snatched a last-gasp equaliser against Newcastle https://t.co/6B7QBQzV79 https://t.co/SuUtminwnw

    2115118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20261.6x their median

    Man Utd news: Myles Lewis-Skelly update emerges as club makes early transfer approach  https://t.co/tlKEKRQN2j

    2130022K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 818K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.097% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126 interactions, about 8.4x its own typical post.

What is Mirror Football's engagement rate on X?
Mirror Football (@MirrorFootball) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 818,279 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Mirror Football sits above the 10th percentile of the 14,517 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MirrorFootball have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MirrorFootball post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going