Back to @MingNa's profile

Ming-Na Wen engagement report

@MingNa - 595K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.131%
of 595K followers
Per impression
2.70%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
4.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
778
interactions (median)
Saved
0.078%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 778 interactions against 595K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 2.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 454K interactions, about 346x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ming-Na Wen's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.131%, Ming-Na Wen sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,259 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link69% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 69% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 329 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 14, 2026346x their median

    FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 53 YEARS, THE KNICKS ARE NBA CHAMPIONS 🏆 New York defeats San Antonio 4-1 in the NBA Finals, capturing their third championship in franchise history! https://t.co/i1gmntBe06

    348K90K5.8K10K50M viewsView on X
  • May 3, 2026130x their median

    May the fourth be with you https://t.co/7MpTpIVAgv

    218K50K2.9K2.0K7.3M viewsView on X
  • Mar 26, 202635x their median

    A young girl practicing martial arts while waiting for the bus. Sometimes, you need less than you think to stay active. https://t.co/whmhqyiTAN

    66K5.8K6897564.1M viewsView on X
  • May 15, 202624x their median

    Ultimate nerdom is when you collect everything you've worked on! If that's wrong, then i don't want to be right! https://t.co/02ModJoFZR

    29K2.6K504195747K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 202621x their median

    "I don't know what I'm feeling." Jalen Brunson is in disbelief after leading the Knicks to the mountaintop 👏 https://t.co/OQRgWcRotw

    24K2.5K266194795K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202624x their median

    Summer's here! Where's my Princess Leia bikini? https://t.co/78H4aSDMio

    18K54826444247K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 20269.0x their median

    Everyone at Lucasfilm was deeply saddened to learn of the passing of Marcia Lucas. One of three Oscar-winning editors who worked on Star Wars: A New Hope, she also contributed to American Graffiti, among other early Lucasfilm productions. We join the global filmmaking community in mourning her loss. A statement from Lucasfilm: https://t.co/U1abKHO7yq

    9.9K1.8K5786274K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 20265.3x their median

    Fennec Shand glammed up for the Mandalorian and Grogu premiere. #Thisistheway https://t.co/t6mBqDpojF

    10K61712860255K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20268.3x their median

    Fennec Shand reunites with Mando & Grogu in Tokyo! 🇯🇵💚🩶🤍 Also, just realized I happen to be wearing Fennec colors too! #thisistheway 🧡🖤 https://t.co/Nk7iQrXOUa

    8.9K1.9K44122359K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 20267.1x their median

    The duo of the summer. Experience Star Wars on the big screen with The Mandalorian and Grogu, now playing only in theaters and IMAX. Get tickets now. Illustrated by @CryssyCheung. #TheMandalorianAndGrogu https://t.co/1bfpomQmY2

    8.0K1.1K7358219K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 778 interactions against 595K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 2.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 454K interactions, about 346x its own typical post.

What is Ming-Na Wen's engagement rate on X?
Ming-Na Wen (@MingNa) has an engagement rate of 0.131%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 595,227 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.131%, Ming-Na Wen sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MingNa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MingNa post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going