Back to @MindPillarTrade's profile

MindPillar engagement report

@MindPillarTrade - 127K followers on X

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 127K followers
Per impression
0.123%
3.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 127K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.123% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #kucoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

MindPillar's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, MindPillar sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 240 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 20262.8x their median

    Bitcoinsensus is now MindPillar. Same account. Same team. Bigger vision: bringing market insights, trading education, and powerful tools together in one place. Welcome to the next chapter âš¡

    100104.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.5x their median

    Eight straight days in Greed on the Bitcoin fear and greed index, sitting at 71. Remember, the typical Greed visit lasts 3 days. Eight is already well past that, but the record is 42. https://t.co/bkSVC6eKUD

    80113.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.5x their median

    If we lose the 82.1k zone, $178M of leveraged Bitcoin positions get liquidated. 1.9% from here. 26% of all positions in the last 24 hours are within 1% of price. 61% within 2%. 80% are running at 50x or higher. These are estimated liquidation prices, worked out from position size and leverage.

    70303.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.3x their median

    Bitcoin at $86,239 is the shallowest drawdown of any cycle at day 351. 2021 is the closest match, and even that was 70.3% down at this same count. Right now the drawdown is 31.6%. 2021 eventually fell 76.7% and took 378 days to reach its low. https://t.co/x1XfxuruOd

    60303.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.0x their median

    BITCOIN: READY FOR THE BREAK! https://t.co/oqx0QfMvVJ

    61012.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.8x their median

    Bitcoin is 32.8% down from $126,080, and 357 days have passed since that high. At day 357 in their own cycles: 2013 was 70.5% down, 2017 was 82.1% down, 2021 was 69.7% down. None of them were this shallow at this point. Not one. https://t.co/OGXZFbrI3b

    51103.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20261.8x their median

    Bitcoin fear and greed crossed back into greed today at 71, one day after printing 78 in extreme greed. This is the 155th time the index has entered this zone since 2018. The longest stay ran 42 days. https://t.co/t6NWVXhKXQ

    51103.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    A single address starting with 0x28c6 just moved 18,444.0 ETH into Binance hot wallet 16. The transfer was one transaction, not broken into pieces. Whoever moved it was not trying to be subtle about it.

    30403.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20261.5x their median

    Bitcoin's fear and greed index is at 72 today, and the crowd has been in Greed for 10 consecutive days. Remember, the typical Greed visit lasts 3 days. Most of the time sentiment flips back before anyone even notices it showed up. The record is 42 days in a row. https://t.co/4NMs6lK42K

    40201.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.5x their median

    Uphold added inheritance for Bitcoin and XRP. The problem it addresses is straightforward. If someone dies holding coins in a private wallet, those coins stay there permanently. No recovery, no transfer. Uphold is citing $331 billion in crypto currently stuck that way. Putting a named beneficiary on an exchange account is the simplest version of a fix.

    31203.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#kucoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 127K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.3K times each, and 0.123% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

What is MindPillar's engagement rate on X?
MindPillar (@MindPillarTrade) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 127,159 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, MindPillar sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MindPillarTrade have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MindPillarTrade post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going