Back to @MikeClayNFL's profile

Mike Clay engagement report

@MikeClayNFL - 319K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 319K followers
Per impression
0.374%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
12.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
152
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 319K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.374% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 100x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026. Recurring tag: #dualthreat.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mike Clay's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, Mike Clay sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 124 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 2026100x their median

    Brock Bowers, who missed Weeks 1-2, is currently fantasy's No. 2 scoring TE on the season. No. 1? Isaiah Likely

    15K1734814484K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202664x their median

    Chicago WR Luther Burden III is expected to miss the preseason due to the strained groin injury he suffered Saturday, but the Bears believe he should be back for the team’s regular-season opener vs. the Panthers, per sources. https://t.co/o0w5V4oA8u

    8.8K5801431821.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202625x their median

    Good news: Colston Loveland leads the Bears with 32 routes run Bad news: Colston Loveland has zero catches

    3.7K44518171K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202624x their median

    Projected NFL Offensive Line Starters for all 32 teams as we approach Week 1 https://t.co/nShj0CfxHg

    3.0K1872961973.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20269.9x their median

    Christian Watson leads the NFL in end zone targets with 7. Matthew Golden is tied for second with 5.

    1.5K2787160K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20269.7x their median

    70% snap share for Tuten, but here comes Chris Rodriguez at the goal line…

    1.4K2647275K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20269.1x their median

    The Dolphins are releasing veteran LB Tyrel Dodson, per source. Miami extended Jordyn Brooks this summer and is excited about second-round pick Jacob Rodriguez’s development.

    1.1K11441117494K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20264.4x their median

    Carnell Tate 20 routes 3 targets 0 catches

    645322382K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20264.3x their median

    Jaguars targets last 3 games: Strange 21 Washington 17 Meyers 15 Cameron 10 Tuten 7 Thomas 6 Boerkircher 5

    623145656K viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 20265.4x their median

    The 2026 NFL Projections PDF is here! https://t.co/lDqA1MltUP -32 Team Pages -Unit Grades -Depth Charts -Positional & category leaderboards -Strength of Schedule -Final 2026 standings -2027 Draft Order -Coaches & Playcallers -Regular updates until Week 1

    469445313572K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dualthreat

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 152 interactions against 319K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.374% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 100x its own typical post.

What is Mike Clay's engagement rate on X?
Mike Clay (@MikeClayNFL) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 319,133 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, Mike Clay sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MikeClayNFL have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MikeClayNFL post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going