Back to @MiiKeLMsT's profile

MiKeL engagement report

@MiiKeLMsT - 210K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 210K followers
Per impression
0.078%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
4.88%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 210K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 81% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 3222x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MiKeL's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, MiKeL sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video6% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link81% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 6% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 81% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 3, 20263222x their median

    Comunicado Oficial: Gonzalo.

    22K1.8K7709572.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 2026382x their median

    Gero es un bicho pero el primer puño con el que le ha tumbado mientras Viruzz esta pidiendo algo al árbitro será legal y lo que tu quieras pero... ahí ya se ha acabado todo. Estoy seguro que hay revancha el año que viene.

    2.8K501769309K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 2026292x their median

    Me está entrando una embolia escuchando comentar en este combate a Momo, solo mete manos Lit según él jaja

    2.2K57431119K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 2026249x their median

    Hay poca gente más histórica que Yandel, sin más.

    1.9K9319256K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026123x their median

    "Son una mentira" "España es puro humo" Las dos ocasiones de gol de Argentina son en los últimos 10 minutos...Y eso que arriba nos falta gol si no imaginate. Veremos a Argentina sin Messi que puede hacer en los próximos años. https://t.co/2rqegKlk63

    8915434228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202696x their median

    Bueno pues casi empatamos en el campo del Espanyol y perdemos en campo del Betis, de nada vale ganar en el Bernabéu si fueras das pena. Vinicius no es ni el 50%, Mbappe tiene la chispa pero desgraciadamente poco IQ y Bellingham hoy de paseo. Solo se salvaba Guler y lo cambia👍

    7351914026K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 202680x their median

    Oye, que putisima locura el cardio de Roro, que pegaba con menos fuerza sí, pero que no ha parado de tirar en todos los asaltos y con el casco de la moto puesto.

    6091318038K viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 202675x their median

    Menudo ventilador de hostias la Roro eh, si tuviera más fuerza cuidado.

    581118051K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202670x their median

    Entra Camavinga por Tchouameni para remontar el partido Ooolee 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

    55065014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202666x their median

    Pues bueno, 2 derrotas y 2 victorias en el 90 fuera de casa, este equipo no tiene fútbol ninguno y así es imposible ser fiable. El Atleti tendría que haber estado con 10 desde la primera parte y precisamente la roja al "Rabioso" Huijsen se cargó el partido, 0 espíritu después.

    509413016K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 210K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.078% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 6% carry an image or video and 81% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 3222x its own typical post.

What is MiKeL's engagement rate on X?
MiKeL (@MiiKeLMsT) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 209,637 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, MiKeL sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MiiKeLMsT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MiiKeLMsT post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going