Miguel Ángel | GptZone engagement report
@MiguelMaestroIA - 219K followers on X
Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 219K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.406% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 42% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.
Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Miguel Ángel | GptZone's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.047%, Miguel Ángel | GptZone sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 73% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 552 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 28, 202641x their median
Uso Claude todo el día sin agotar mi límite de tokens. Claude no cuenta mensajes, cuenta tokens. Algunas conversaciones agotan tu límite 10× más rápido que otras. Si quieres usar Claude todo el día sin quedarte sin límite, usa estos 10 trucos:
- Sep 25, 202618x their median
Tengo una hija de 11 años y un hijo de 8. Hablar con ellos sobre internet y su seguridad online no es fácil. No quiero que le tengan miedo, pero tampoco quiero que crezcan pensando que todo lo que ocurre detrás de una pantalla es inofensivo. Esta campaña de Nueva Zelanda explica algo que muchos padres todavía no sabemos muy bien cómo abordar. Y lo hace sin asustar, prohibir ni soltarles una charla de 40 minutos. Lo hace con humor. Porque mis hijos van a descubrir internet conmigo o sin mí. Van a usar redes. Van a hablar con gente que no conocen. Van a encontrarse contenido que no entienden. Y seguramente cometerán errores. Pretender evitar absolutamente todo me parece imposible. Para mí hay algo mucho más importante, que cuando ocurra algo extraño, incómodo o que no entiendan, tengan la confianza suficiente para venir y contármelo. Además, en mi caso sería bastante hipócrita convertir la tecnología en el enemigo. Mis hijos saben que gran parte de mi vida profesional ocurre en internet. Me ven trabajar con tecnología, probar herramientas y hablar de IA constantemente. Por eso prefiero enseñarles a utilizarla. Con límites, por supuesto, pero también con curiosidad, criterio y confianza. Porque quizá proteger a nuestros hijos en internet no consiste en vigilar cada pantalla que miran. Consiste en conseguir que nunca tengan miedo de enseñarnos lo que aparece en ella.
- Oct 3, 202616x their median
No sé jugar al ajedrez, pero tiene bastante sentido. https://t.co/bt2ixj9Uwb
- Oct 1, 202611x their median
Dile a ChatGPT que lo vas a desinstalar y comparte una captura de su respuesta en los comentarios. Empiezo yo 😂 https://t.co/rDhFp3Krnz
- Sep 25, 202610x their median
Puedes convertir un libro entero en contenido visual con ChatGPT. He hecho la prueba con "Hábitos Atómicos". Solo tienes que adjuntar el libro y utilizar estos 4 comandos. El resultado es una locura 👇 https://t.co/t2JUd72ejU
- Sep 28, 202610x their median
🚨Ivan Nardini, experto AI/ML, te enseña a convertir una idea en una app real. Guarda esta CLASE MAGISTRAL de 26 minutos que he subtitulado al español. https://t.co/giH9yjuLsc
- Sep 28, 20264.8x their median
Una de las tareas más absurdas que repetíamos en GptZone era volver a descubrir por qué un contenido había funcionado. Publicábamos un post que se hacía viral. Semanas después queríamos replicarlo y empezaba lo de siempre: ¿Fue el tema? ¿El hook? ¿La estructura? ¿Qué decían las métricas? Primero intentamos solucionarlo con una hoja de cálculo donde guardábamos nuestros mejores contenidos, resultados y aprendizajes. El problema era que había que mantenerla actualizada y volver a analizar todo manualmente cada vez. Así que hicimos una prueba con Viktor. Viktor es un empleado basado en IA que funciona en Slack y Microsoft Teams y se conecta a más de 3.200 herramientas. Le pedimos que recuperara el contexto de nuestras noticias y posts virales, analizara sus métricas, identificara los patrones que se repetían y preparara las siguientes piezas basándose en esos datos. 30 minutos después teníamos 10 nuevas noticias listas para revisar. No empezó desde cero. Utilizó lo que nuestro equipo ya había aprendido. Nosotros revisamos las propuestas, hicimos los ajustes y decidimos qué publicar. Y ahí entendí que una de las aplicaciones más interesantes de la IA quizá no sea generar más ideas. Es evitar que tu equipo olvide por qué funcionaron las buenas. Porque publicar algo viral una vez puede ser suerte. Convertir lo aprendido en un proceso es otra cosa. Hire @viktor_com for your team. $100 in credits included, no card. Full link in first comment. En colaboración con Viktor
- Sep 23, 20264.2x their median
¡Ayer se lanzó Claude Opus 5.5 y JODER, ES UNA LOCURA! Lo que la gente está construyendo empieza a ser ridículo. Y esto acaba de empezar. 27 EJEMPLOS SALVAJES:
- Sep 9, 20263.1x their median
ÚLTIMA HORA: Si no utilizas a Claude en tu trabajo, ya vas con retraso. Copia estos 10 prompts: Guarda esto antes de que se vuelva viral.
- Sep 10, 20263.0x their median
🚨UN PSICÓLOGO EXPLICÓ POR QUÉ LOS NIÑOS DE LOS 90 PIENSAN DIFERENTE A LA GENERACIÓN Z. Y cuanto más lo pienso, más sentido tiene. Antes encendías la consola y tenías:
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 102 interactions against 219K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.406% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 42% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.1K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.
- What is Miguel Ángel | GptZone's engagement rate on X?
- Miguel Ángel | GptZone (@MiguelMaestroIA) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 218,865 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.047%, Miguel Ángel | GptZone sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MiguelMaestroIA have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MiguelMaestroIA post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.63 posts per day across the measured window.