PlayerSells
Back to @MiaMalkova's profile

Mia Malkova engagement report

@MiaMalkova - 3.6M followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.491%
of 3.6M followers
Per impression
5.25%
335K views on a typical post
Reach
9.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.67%
2.2K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 18K interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.491%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 329 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 335K times each, and 5.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 2.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mia Malkova's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (329 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.491%, Mia Malkova sits above the 75th percentile of the 9,573 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.318% to 2.70%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.045%
p750.318%
p902.70%
p99370.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,573 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 462,938 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.045%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.70%
99th percentile370.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 107%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC+10%4.7K
01:00 UTC+7%4.6K
02:00 UTC+4%4.7K
03:00 UTC+4%4.6K
04:00 UTC+5%4.2K
05:00 UTC-2%4.2K
06:00 UTC-10%4.2K
07:00 UTC-3%4.7K
08:00 UTC-5%5.5K
09:00 UTC+7%6.1K
10:00 UTC+1%7.0K
11:00 UTC-3%7.6K
12:00 UTC-3%8.7K
13:00 UTC-1%10K
14:00 UTC-5%11K
15:00 UTC-6%12K
16:00 UTC-3%12K
17:00 UTC-4%11K
18:00 UTC+1%9.5K
19:00 UTC-2%8.7K
20:00 UTC-2%7.7K
21:00 UTC+5%6.6K
22:00 UTC+3%5.7K
23:00 UTC+7%4.7K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 107%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+18%25K
Monday+10%41K
Tuesday-24%42K
Wednesday+2%14K
Thursday0%16K
Friday0%19K
Saturday+16%22K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+53%+46% to +62%1.9K
Outbound link26% of posts-52%-54% to -49%2.2K
Typical length-+25%+20% to +29%2.3K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 53% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 52% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 61 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 25% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    Morning nude :)) https://t.co/PIishIMwhg

    33K1.2K2875337K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20262.0x their median

    Like this post if you've ever jerked off to me https://t.co/VnOfh6FRIW

    33K1.3K41320836K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20261.8x their median

    Yes or no? https://t.co/Kfaro6wWdl

    30K1.3K57912766K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.7x their median

    Ready to be sucked 🤭 https://t.co/bv5EXLG6Qm

    29K1.1K2569565K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.7x their median

    No bra, no panties 😇 https://t.co/AccE13QWXF

    28K1.0K3108194K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.6x their median

    Just wanted to show you my tits 🥺 https://t.co/ZfUL06q3HU

    26K96449710227K viewsView on X
  • May 26, 20261.6x their median

    Just in case you needed tiddies to goon to 😋 https://t.co/Sva3EU3VNP

    26K1.0K31610804K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20261.5x their median

    Wataa ❤️ https://t.co/LnQsYHhddb

    26K9512852327K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20261.5x their median

    Hiiiii (say it back) 💕 https://t.co/YoUv9P4Y2Q

    25K7973994354K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Instagram’s view vs X’s view 🤭 https://t.co/PMBf9CtLxK

    25K8502168328K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18K interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.491%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 329 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 335K times each, and 5.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 2.0x its own typical post.

What is Mia Malkova's engagement rate on X?
Mia Malkova (@MiaMalkova) has an engagement rate of 0.491%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,575,134 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.491%, Mia Malkova sits above the 75th percentile of the 9,573 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MiaMalkova have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (329 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MiaMalkova post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going