Back to @MetisL2's profile

Metis🌿 engagement report

@MetisL2 - 207K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.037%
of 207K followers
Per impression
1.14%
6.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
77
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.4/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 77 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Metis🌿's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.037%, Metis🌿 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 298 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 202618x their median

    I think we're in for a rude awakening in the ad markets: If a huge part of your business is showing targeted display ads to humans what happens when agents browse your website and get the job done without a human seeing your ads at all?

    1.1K6721253104K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202617x their median

    Did a PR to one of our upstream projects and they requested some minor changes. What’s even the point with this workflow? You already wrote the prompt, why make me ping my agent again so your agent then merges?

    1.1K1714525232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.4x their median

    Here it is: AI can now use all of your iPhone and iPad. All of it. Without limitation or exception. Yes, really. You’re watching a GPT-6 Astra OpenClaw agent, spoken to via VoiceClaw Realtime on my iPhone, controlling my iPad by using my soon-to-be-released macOS app for full AI control of your iPhone or iPad. Yes, really. With this forthcoming macOS app from me, it will no longer matter if your iPhone/iPad apps are built for Siri, or have AI capabilities of their own. With this one app, OpenClaw, Codex, Hermes, or Claude Code AI agents can control your iPhone or iPad in every way you can. Without limitation. Everything you can do on your phone, it can do. Everything. No physical proximity, cable, bluetooth or shared-wifi-network connection between the macOS computer and your iPhone/iPad is needed. Translation: you no longer need Siri. Ever. At all. Coming soon. P.S.: I have one question: What would you pay for a one-year license for this app, or for a lifetime license?

    1371035129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Metis wrapped an 8-week AI Agent builder program this summer, run with ClawUp, GOAT Network, LazAI, CryptoChicks, and MindFuel. From 91 applicants, 9 teams reached the finals, judged not on demos, but on real users and onchain traction. https://t.co/ZqXPl6RwRE

    78141369.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    Happy Mid-Autumn Festival to everyone celebrating! 🌕 https://t.co/ECqZpFLuLe

    8812517.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Most AI workflows still rely on a single agent to research, write, and review everything in one context window. ClawUp takes a different approach with multi-agent teams, where specialized agents collaborate, delegate tasks, and work in parallel. https://t.co/fNt78R3smc

    7788814K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Your agent doesn't stay static. Every run, it learns from the interaction, picks up new skills, and improves on its own. Build once. Let it grow. https://t.co/CbPdF9Y52u https://t.co/XHk4B3hHCP

    8412406.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 2026

    Deploy your own AI agent in seconds. Choose a runtime (OpenClaw or Hermes), pick your model, and hit deploy. No servers. No complex setup. No waiting. Your harness. Your agent. Your memory. Try it now → https://t.co/CbPdF9Y52u https://t.co/16gPuNxiP6

    7314826.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    1/5 The AI industry has gotten incredibly good at building agents. Research agent? Done. Coding or customer support? Easy. Creating an agent is no longer the hard part. Reality check: recent enterprise surveys show less than 15% of AI agent pilots ever reach production. The real question: how do you keep an agent useful over time?

    65491143K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    Stargate support for Metis Andromeda ends Oct 23. LayerZero's default DVN/Executor stops on Oct 30. LPs: withdraw from Stargate pools by Oct 23. V1-bridged METIS, HERA, QI, MTVT: bridge back by Oct 23. m.USDC, m.USDT, WETH, METIS: unaffected. https://t.co/OnuMhSSjlK

    6614705.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 77 interactions against 207K followers, an engagement rate of 0.037%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.8K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 26% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is Metis🌿's engagement rate on X?
Metis🌿 (@MetisL2) has an engagement rate of 0.037%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 207,394 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.037%, Metis🌿 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MetisL2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MetisL2 post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going