Back to @Meryreyess's profile

TuOdontologoTatuada🦷🐉 engagement report

@Meryreyess - 100K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.059%
of 100K followers
Per impression
2.35%
2.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
59
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 31% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 459x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TuOdontologoTatuada🦷🐉's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.059%, TuOdontologoTatuada🦷🐉 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 97 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 19, 2026459x their median

    "seguro tenes a otros" amor no t tengo ni a vos

    22K5.2K24195176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026331x their median

    ben bir şekilde hallederim hep hallettim https://t.co/IIabarzfIp

    14K5.4K18197330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026227x their median

    https://t.co/ch5RQLNz0w

    12K5866072195K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026202x their median

    La reputísima madre que lo remil parió https://t.co/VdkZtDkF1Z

    9.9K5567087732.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202691x their median

    ✨ HECHO ESTÁ ✨ https://t.co/K5UID6extn

    5.0K320322446K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202670x their median

    https://t.co/jJkKrIpDmv

    2.8K1.2K18867K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202664x their median

    被一条帖子震到了:一个 21 岁的美国大学生,靠 AI 虚拟女友一个月赚了 4.3 万美元。 他搞了个 OnlyFans 账号,叫 Maya。这个 Maya 设定 22 岁,标签是 UCF 心理学辍学生,有 1247 个付费订阅者,花钱最多的粉丝刷了 1847 美元。但最关键的是啥?照片里那个女孩根本不存在。 不出镜,没人打字。所有消息都是 AI 写的,照片是 AI 生成的,声音是 AI 合成的。整个 Maya 说白了,就是他 MacBook 上的四个文档。 以前搞一个 AI 虚拟网红,得花六个月到一年半。现在他 4 周就跑起来了。往后看,可能一个周末就能整一个。 这四个文件这么分的: · persona.md,写清楚 Maya 的性格、背景故事和喜好; · voice.md,定死她的说话语气和声音风格; · flux.md,统一她的长相和照片风格,保证所有图看起来像同一个人; · brain.md,记录每个订阅者聊过啥、喜欢啥。 AI 回复粉丝之前,会先读一遍这四个文件,所以人设不会崩,也不会忘了粉丝说过的话。 说实话,这套技术栈简单到有点离谱。之前那个很火的虚拟网红 Aitana López?她的团队花了 18 个月才搞出来。现在 Maya 这种配置,4 周搞定。 这不是科幻——是任何有台电脑的人都能照着一步步复制的东西。而且不只 OnlyFans,把这套流程搬到 Instagram、TikTok 或者 Twitch 上,一样跑得通。 AI 基本把造一个虚拟人的成本打到了零。到这一步,唯一的门槛就剩你有没有品味,来决定这个虚拟人该长啥样。

    3.1K428145521.3M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202654x their median

    https://t.co/PFCUBV3e3G

    2.4K646113940K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202648x their median

    No hagan drama, solo desaparezcan y ya

    2.2K59733944K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 202637x their median

    ... https://t.co/8oRstKRLQd

    1.7K46573821K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 100K followers, an engagement rate of 0.059%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 31% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 459x its own typical post.

What is TuOdontologoTatuada🦷🐉's engagement rate on X?
TuOdontologoTatuada🦷🐉 (@Meryreyess) has an engagement rate of 0.059%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 100,205 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.059%, TuOdontologoTatuada🦷🐉 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Meryreyess have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Meryreyess post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going