Back to @Mericamemed's profile

MERICA MEMED engagement report

@Mericamemed - 357K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.054%
of 357K followers
Per impression
1.56%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
3.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.225%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 648x its own typical post.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MERICA MEMED's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, MERICA MEMED sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 94 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026648x their median

    Yeah we're going to war https://t.co/E6zrVCGRBy

    118K6.0K9506504.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026230x their median

    Probably the best explanation I have heard about this trial if she is found not guilty. https://t.co/nZVqIfplPR

    35K8.4K9277541.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026186x their median

    👮‍♂️Polk County, Georgia Deputy Shoots Baby Donkey HeeHaw 🫏 ❓Will you help us make sure HeeHaw’s death isn’t just another ignored story? 🚨Shared for 'Elsberry Riding & Farm' "PLEASE SHARE! Polk county deputy KILLED my baby donkey! At 12:45am cops entered my pasture searching for a missing person WITHOUT permission or warning and shot and killed my bottle raised BABY donkey. They claimed he ran up to them braying and they thought they were in danger and shot and killed him after trying to taze him. HeeHaw was raised in the house and did petting zoos he never knew a stranger. And was shot and killed in his OWN pasture for doing what donkeys do. Alerting to a stranger. There is no way this is legal! I will be taking legal action. Share this everywhere and get justice for HeeHaw. We are heart broken 💔 he was my son!" ---------------------------------------------------------- ❓Why did they shoot him after the taser instead of backing out of his pasture? ❓How do you get justice when they kill an animal that trusted people?

    23K9.9K2.1K910792K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202629x their median

    Back in time in the...Nineteen hundreds. Stop lady 😭 https://t.co/iGRe5xfJ2C

    4.8K47624688334K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.5x their median

    We’re OK with that. We’re completely OK with that. https://t.co/iA4KoeU5Ia

    1.0K381801238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.9x their median

    This film was from 2009 and its now even worse than this. https://t.co/dpnAnHFoX1

    1.0K1036331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.3x their median

    The 45-70 is a phenomenal round for situations like this https://t.co/lrdnEzk6Fl

    96028373140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.0x their median

    Larry is almost always right 😂 https://t.co/dWHHjkp3V9

    944237468K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.7x their median

    “Dude, I think she’s into me.” - every half drunk, middle aged, amateur golfer. https://t.co/53FG2TyXxR

    88011230121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.7x their median

    Pacific Rim: Woke Rises. The Jaegers are doing God’s work to protect humanity. https://t.co/gGCt8PVmAp

    7888728692K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 357K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 648x its own typical post.

What is MERICA MEMED's engagement rate on X?
MERICA MEMED (@Mericamemed) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 357,305 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, MERICA MEMED sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Mericamemed have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Mericamemed post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going