Back to @MensFitnessX's profile

Men's Fitness engagement report

@MensFitnessX - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 245 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
0.041%
4.9K views on a typical post
Reach
0.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
8.17/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 245 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.486% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 245 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 245 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Men's Fitness's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Men's Fitness sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202616x their median

    Creatine is the most researched and one of the safest supplements in the world, yet most people treat it as a short term gym aid. So what happens if you take it daily for a full year? https://t.co/yaVAYuKBsg

    2173118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202611x their median

    A full push, pull, and leg day breakdown, with notes, designed for real results. https://t.co/QzIwtb7RY8

    1821020K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202610x their median

    Fifty straight pushups is a real benchmark. Here is an eight week progression that starts from wherever you are, whether that is 5 or 35. https://t.co/s7b7UIIfKy

    1730015K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202610x their median

    Muscles respond to movement patterns and hard sets, not variety. Here is the minimum number of exercises for chest, back, shoulders, legs, arms, and core. https://t.co/Y8D23317BI

    1352014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20269.5x their median

    Warren Zeiders opens up about losing lacrosse to concussions, reaching 220 pounds, rebuilding his body, his five-day workout split and getting too lean. https://t.co/hVXoIT7Hhl

    1522014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.5x their median

    Want a lean, powerful athletic physique without playing a sport? Learn how strength, power, conditioning, and movement combine to build an athlete’s body. https://t.co/BHst8GJc2g

    1033112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.0x their median

    Most people take creatine without knowing how it works. Here's the simple explanation. https://t.co/GfY2Blk6Cq

    1420018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.0x their median

    Adults who could not stand on one leg for 10 seconds had an 84 percent higher death risk. How to run the test properly, and what a poor result means. https://t.co/0wpFnFWtK9

    103219.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20267.5x their median

    A review of 13 studies found no difference in muscle growth between machines and free weights. Where they differ: strength transfer, fatigue, and safety. https://t.co/xbyJsQfI0B

    1050011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20267.5x their median

    This squat variation skips the hip hinge to put maximum tension directly on your quads. https://t.co/OhwUHMjxAG

    1140023K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 245 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.486% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 8.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 245 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32 interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Men's Fitness's engagement rate on X?
Men's Fitness (@MensFitnessX) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 245 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,006,762 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Men's Fitness sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MensFitnessX have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MensFitnessX post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 8.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going