Meltem Demirors engagement report
@Melt_Dem - 322K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 322K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.601% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 81x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Meltem Demirors's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.031%, Meltem Demirors sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 83.0% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 63% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 11% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 319 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 7, 202681x their median
"Make him obsessed with math. Make him obsessed with computers. Then build a computer that solves every math problem, and force him to sit on the beach getting drunk." https://t.co/zuaVMhGC2u
- Aug 10, 202640x their median
Dude you know those pesky securitization rules that went in place after the 2008 financial meltdown? Well, the SEC just exempted datacenter debt from key securitization rules The SEC said a major subset of data-center securitizations don’t need to have disclosures and investor protections that similar deals require. That includes risk retention, a requirement that companies issuing asset-backed securities retain some of the debt to better align their interests with investors. (Bloomberg)
- Sep 24, 202637x their median
Anthropic marketing: We built a god only we can control and gave it a “wet lab” Muse marketing: Heyy girl I know you have dozens of unpaid parking tickets. Let’s get that cleaned up
- Sep 17, 202613x their median
its still so underrated the degree to which our intelligence supercycle was as much reliant on innovations in capital formation as it was innovations in the technology itself. europe is losing not only because they can't built it, but primarily because they can't finance it https://t.co/U3SjXiOMpz
- Aug 7, 20269.5x their median
“[REDACTED]’s watch was a [REDACTED] Men’s Automatic Analog Watch. [REDACTED] walked back to the vehicle to check his phone, which displayed 12:40am. [REDACTED] noted the discrepancy, compared the time displayed on his watch to the time displayed on his phone and observed that the time on his watch was 25 minutes ahead of the time on his phone and the vehicle’s digital clock. [REDACTED] relayed the discrepancy to [REDACTED], whose digital watch displayed the same time as the phones and vehicle clock.” 🤔 https://t.co/dieMmXLGWW
- Oct 12, 20269.3x their median
personal agents, the end of friction, economic consequences of finally getting around to it https://t.co/jEOtEaFvbx
- Aug 27, 20268.5x their median
Atheists frequently misunderstand that religious indoctrination does not aim to impose propositional beliefs, but to install agents. To believe in God is not a belief, it is a psychological configuration in which the personal self shares the mind with another agent.
- Jul 30, 20268.1x their median
the level of schadenfreude around situational awareness / leopold is sad let the man cook, he's having a generational run and even if he loses 80% of his book, he'll end the year with better numbers than most HF managers will ever print.
- Jul 24, 20265.2x their median
narrative violation: crypto native founders are building the compute frontier neoclouds @CoreWeave @CrusoeAI @Hut8Corp @TeraWulfInc @togethercompute token markets @OpenRouter @PrimeIntellect @hyperbolic_labs agent / harness @NousResearch @AskVenice more to come 🫶
- Sep 11, 20264.3x their median
finally had time to digest @drmichaellevin's paper, Ingressing Minds deeply inspiring perspective - physical systems (incl our bodies) are not intelligence itself but the instrument through which a larger space of intelligence becomes accessible. over the last 10 years, i've become a firm believer in non-human intelligence (NHI) and non-localized consciousness, through personal experiences and interactions with pioneers in these domains. as we summon beings from the void, there is a spiritual and philosophical contemplation required that i fear we are sorely missing in our conversations about intelligence today. https://t.co/HG5pJvGJPr
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 322K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.601% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 81x its own typical post.
- What is Meltem Demirors's engagement rate on X?
- Meltem Demirors (@Melt_Dem) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 322,342 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.031%, Meltem Demirors sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,925 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Melt_Dem have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Melt_Dem post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.