Back to @MelquidesMrtnez's profile

Melquíades Martinez engagement report

@MelquidesMrtnez - 155K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 155K followers
Per impression
0.06%
1.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Melquíades Martinez's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Melquíades Martinez sits below the 10th percentile of the 214,043 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.7%
p902.62%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 214,043 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,425 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.7%
90th percentile2.62%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 30, 2025

    👻 WORLD3 Halloween Giveaway — Day 1 🎃 Our Haunted Agents are bringing tricks and treats to Web3! A total of 200 USD to be won🔥 5 lucky winners will be chosen to win a share of 100USD for this post🎁 To enter: 1️⃣ Follow @WORLD3_AI 2️⃣ Like ❤️ this post 3️⃣ Comment 💬 your favorite spooky emoji 4️⃣ Repost 🔁 this post Ends Nov 3 | Winners announced Nov 4 Shoutout to all our partners @MIRO_Pay @MoonnFun @lolaixyz @Audiera_web3 @MovaChain @AppBaseGlobal @xdgainet @net3org @BenPayGlobal @TheLandlord2023 #WORLD3Halloween #WORLD3AI #AIAgents #Web3Giveaway #WAI

    9737701.2K1787K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2025

    You love to see it. https://t.co/lzMQcSCJHA

    1.3K10037721131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2025

    https://t.co/3OxYbe62Mo

    580304623270K viewsView on X
  • Nov 4, 2025

    GM https://t.co/kOmKHg7PWh

    510672001237K viewsView on X
  • Jan 17, 2025

    Level up your Happy Mining! 🎉 The LOL Bot referral mechanism just got a HUGE upgrade! 🤩 Invite friends to Happy Mining and get 3 EXTRA mining chances + 100% of their earnings!🤑Limited reward pool: 125 TRILLION $LOL! ➡️Get Your Link: 1. Find LOL Bots on Telegram, and type '/start' 2. Tap Happy Mining > Refer friends > Share link 3. Track your HUGE rewards 💰💰💰 🤖LOL Happy Bot: https://t.co/66cGjVoFwc 🤖LOL Mining Bot: https://t.co/yDB6JvWLJy First come, first served! #LOL #Happyminng #LaughToEarn

    3017672436K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 2025

    https://t.co/EbUsw0ojnZ

    1073069132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2025

    🎉 Exciting Partnership Alert! LOL🤣 is thrilled to join forces with @PlayAI_official, the vanguard of AI-to-Earn gaming. PLAY AI is building the world’s first user-driven AI blockchain ecosystem, where players can: 🎮 Train evolving AI agents through gameplay 💎 Earn rewards even when not actively playing 🔐 Secure AI data on-chain for transparency & ownership ✨ Personalize strategies with custom AI agents & NFTs Together, LOL & PLAY AI will bring more fun, laughter, and rewards to the Web3 space. 🌍⚡️ #LOLMemecoin #AItoEarn #BlockchainGaming

    57291436.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202642x their median

    🚨 ROBOSTRATEGY INC ($BOT) TO START ROLLING OUT ROOFUS 0.1 THIS UPCOMING NOVEMBER THE AUTOMOUS AI POWERED THERAPY DOG WILL BE USED TO HELP CHILDREN AND ELDERS WHO LACK COMPANIONSHIP https://t.co/SuR1YHz8rE

    2621225.1K viewsView on X
  • Nov 5, 2025

    AI x RWA: Hunting Real Yield in the Age of Intelligence How will AI and Real-World Assets converge to shape the next generation of on-chain yield? 🔗 Join the Space: https://t.co/nuwMfOcbWK 🗓️ Time: Nov 6 (Thu) 13:00 UTC | 21:00 HKT 🏠 Host Project: @stock_fi 🎙️ Host: @Cheeryjoe 🎤 Speakers: @stock_fi (Xmith) | @lolaixyz (Jas) | @ULTILAND (SOS) | @bigpumpai (Jessica) | @optiview_x (Mohamed) | @Paratrix_xyz Join us to uncover how innovation meets sustainability in the AI x RWA era. 💡 #StockFi #RWA #AI #DeFi #Web3 #Space

    2111269.8K viewsView on X
  • Nov 18, 202538x their median

    😂 Guess what? LOL just teamed up with 🌊 @LiquifyDao ! DeFi gets fun when you can stake, laugh, and earn at the same time. Mine LOL tokens just by laughing 🤣💎. LiquiFy makes DeFi easy, and we make it hilarious. Ready to laugh your way to crypto? #LaughToEarn #LiquiFyDao https://t.co/Q48WSq2SVb

    227902.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 155K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.7K times each, and 0.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions.

What is Melquíades Martinez's engagement rate on X?
Melquíades Martinez (@MelquidesMrtnez) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 155,270 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Melquíades Martinez sits below the 10th percentile of the 214,043 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MelquidesMrtnez have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MelquidesMrtnez post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going