Back to @McShay13's profile

Todd McShay engagement report

@McShay13 - 727K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 727K followers
Per impression
0.466%
75K views on a typical post
Reach
10.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
350
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.83/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 350 interactions against 727K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 0.466% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #fdpartner.

Compared with accounts its own size

Todd McShay's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, Todd McShay sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,825 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link37% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 37% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 172 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202630x their median

    Watching Kamario Taylor throw at Manning Passing Academy was an event. He’s just different! This throw is stupid. https://t.co/wvVgo4hFCx

    9.6K436902772.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 202624x their median

    "I won't pretend to be up here and defend Bryson. I'm not particularly fond of him. I think a lot of it's performative. I think a lot of it's for attention." Rory McIlroy commented on Bryson DeChambeau’s two-shot penalty at Royal Birkdale and how he handled it. 🗣️ https://t.co/gTyCp95jxC

    6.5K3481.1K3525.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202618x their median

    ESPN hockey voice Steve Levy on the passing of his longtime friend & co-worker Barry Melrose https://t.co/QJ953Q81BC

    5.7K51756471.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202615x their median

    Yo, this is a SEEEED from Byrd Ficklin 😳 https://t.co/o8QZzWK9Nt

    4.5K371832091.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202614x their median

    My initial reaction to South Carolina’s indefinite suspension of Dylan Stewart, the No. 3 prospect on my 2027 NFL Draft board. https://t.co/8ApU8z74CM

    4.6K21216333538K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202611x their median

    TRENDING: Antonio Williams embarrassed TWO of the NFL’s top coverage DB’s today. Both Nate Wiggins (Ravens CB) and Kyle Hamilton (Ravens S) reportedly “couldn’t guard” Williams. One NFL scout reportedly believes “there’s some” Amon-Ra St. Brown to Williams’ game 😳 (Via DHarrison82/X)

    3.6K22499541.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202610x their median

    Patriots announced they signed second-round pick Gabe Jacas.

    3.4K131103181.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20269.4x their median

    "He can have a young Travis Kelce effect for this New York Giants offense." —@Realrclark25 on Isaiah Likely possibly becoming a key component for the Giants 👀 https://t.co/5UiIgS0hni

    2.6K1232703034.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20268.2x their median

    I am socializing my Big Ten QB rankings https://t.co/QIVnpMBvoG

    2.3K753611231.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20266.1x their median

    Sean McVay on what has become non-negotiable when evaluating players: “There are certain things that have to be non-negotiables. What’s your football character like? I think that more than anything, especially because of some of the things I’ve gone through where I look back and say, ‘Man, I did not like the kind of leader or the caliber of person I was. I was fragile. I wasn’t resilient. The game honors toughness, but I think life and the game honor toughness, both mentally and physically. How many different ways can we measure that mental resilience?" "What have they been through, and how did that shape who they’ve become in the midst of the journey?” “When you go through each guy and have a personal message of appreciation and gratitude for him, the consistent theme is that everybody who has had any sort of success has experienced some adversity. Maybe when you’re in it, you don’t see the light at the end of the tunnel, but if it shapes you and callouses you the right way, growth demands that discomfort.” “You don’t punish people who haven’t been through adversity, but I also think it’s important for guys to know, ‘We’re in this shit with you, too. Let’s build a relationship.’” “Chris Petersen always used to say to me, ‘It’s really important that all our players know they’ll never meet the enemy on the sideline.’ I’d like to think the connection, the camaraderie and the enjoyment of each other’s success are what you see when you watch our group play. That’s the type of people we’re trying to identify.”

    1.9K1792334993K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fdpartner

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 350 interactions against 727K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 0.466% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is Todd McShay's engagement rate on X?
Todd McShay (@McShay13) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 726,558 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, Todd McShay sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @McShay13 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @McShay13 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going