Back to @MazzucatoM's profile

Mariana Mazzucato engagement report

@MazzucatoM - 248K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 248K followers
Per impression
1.22%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
98
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 735 interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kindleflash, #planméxico, #ssrgconference.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #kindleflash, #planméxico, #ssrgconference.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mariana Mazzucato's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, Mariana Mazzucato sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,576 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,420 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 388 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 20267.5x their median

    What if we treated Notting Hill Carnival not simply as an event to be funded, but as infrastructure to be invested in? Its communities produce skills, knowledge, networks and innovation that endure long after the last sound system switches off. That requires a very different conversation about public investment—and about who gets to shape Carnival’s future. Seeing it that way changes the question from what Carnival costs to how public institutions can better support and govern the ecosystems that produce it. Our @IIPP_UCL project with @AlvaroBarringto links Carnival in London, Rio and Salvador to develop that framework. Carnival Economics project ➡️ https://t.co/X6M95PgltD Our @NewStatesman piece ➡️ https://t.co/sSS9QvGLEd

    27672272115503K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20266.5x their median

    The Common Good Economy is published in Spain next month as Bien Común: Una nueva economía que funcione para todos. I'll be in Spain for the launch from 4 to 6 October, stay tuned for events. Pere Rusiñol writes about the book, and about what a serious progressive alternative in economics requires, for @RevistaAlterEco. Read the review ➡️ https://t.co/0ZFRN7hkKC More on The Common Good Economy (launch events listed here) ➡️ https://t.co/SrB8G8en89

    4631568938K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    Climate resilience is usually invisible until it fails. Swimmable rivers are a version people can see, use and defend. Treat clean water as climate infrastructure and you build the firms, skills and supply chains to keep it that way, while cutting the cost of inaction. New in @ProSyn on Swimmable Cities ➡️ https://t.co/AW76l4K4ns

    210767510K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.8x their median

    In the old economics, doing good is a correction. In an economics of the common good, it is an objective we design and work on together. My new book, The Common Good Economy, is published in the US today. Join me at @TheNewSchool in New York tonight for the launch of The Common Good Economy, in conversation with Professor @DarrickHamilton and the poet Natalie Diaz. Register ➡️ https://t.co/DGubMmlJ8v More on the book ➡️ https://t.co/J7oie4hJdC

    19967667.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20262.4x their median

    The Common Good Economy: A New Compass is out today! It draws together a decade of work--from The Entrepreneurial State to Mission Economy--and asks a different question: not just what the state can do, or how missions can be governed, but what principles have to be in place for any of that to deliver genuine transformation for people and planet. Links in replies.

    1675014428K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.6x their median

    What would it mean to build an economy around the common good: one that we actively shape together? Join me at @TheNewSchool in New York for the launch of my new book, The Common Good Economy, in conversation with Prof @DarrickHamilton and Natalie Diaz. Tishman Auditorium | Tue 8 Sep | 20:00 EDT https://t.co/DGubMmlJ8v

    11339707.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    Looking forward to Notting Hill Carnival in just a few days! Standard economic frameworks can capture policing costs, tourism receipts, and short-term market activity. They struggle with everything else Carnival produces: skills formation, social infrastructure, joy, civic trust, capabilities built across communities and institutions. Carnival Economics, our @IIPP_UCL project with @AlvaroBarringto, is about recognising and measuring real public value, so that arts and culture are understood as central to how economies create value rather than peripheral to it. Links below.

    93261039.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    We are hiring three people to work directly in my office at our institute, @IIPP_UCL. IIPP was founded to rethink the role of the state and to challenge traditional economic thinking. Markets are outcomes of interactions between actors, so public policy is not limited to fixing market failures: it can actively shape and co-create markets, and create public value in doing so. Turning that into research, policy and public argument takes a team. Links below.

    85404310K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    What would it mean to build an economy around the common good: one that we actively shape together? Join me at @TheNewSchool in New York for the launch of my new book, The Common Good Economy, in conversation with Prof @DarrickHamilton and Natalie Diaz. Tishman Auditorium | Tue 8 Sep | 20:00 EDT https://t.co/DGubMmlJ8v

    9231317.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    In the old economics, doing good is a correction to market failure. In an economics of the common good, it is an objective in its own right, and culture is how we imagine that objective and co-create it with the people it affects. Good discussion at @ftweekend today with Prof @DaisyFancourt, Nikki Wright of Bank of America, with Melanie Gerlis from @FT as chair. Links below.

    8833317.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#kindleflash#planméxico#ssrgconference

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 248K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 735 interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kindleflash, #planméxico, #ssrgconference.

What is Mariana Mazzucato's engagement rate on X?
Mariana Mazzucato (@MazzucatoM) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 248,229 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, Mariana Mazzucato sits above the 25th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MazzucatoM have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MazzucatoM post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going