Back to @Maximus_4EVR's profile

👑 Mαχιмυs Knιgнт ♞ engagement report

@Maximus_4EVR - 137K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.089%
of 137K followers
Per impression
3.00%
4.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.96%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
122
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 3.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

👑 Mαχιмυs Knιgнт ♞'s engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.089%, 👑 Mαχιмυs Knιgнт ♞ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 230 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 202313x their median

    ✝️ Believers & Friends: My Mom had surgery for cancer, and I have a Praise Report to share: her doctors caught it in time, and it did not spread! She is "cured", per her oncologist. Oh, thank you so mucho for all the prayers! Never doubt the efficacy of prayer, my friends. Let's all rejoice and pray for one another (and for America)! If you are interested in me starting a Bible Study Group or a 24/7 Prayer Channel for people to drop prayer requests, please email [email protected] and let her know. Isn't the Lord wonderful? No matter what you're going through: never doubt Him. Jesus is still in the business of healing! 🫶 ~@Maximus_4EVR 🙏

    1.4K11910618258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202610x their median

    We need an old fashioned Holy Spirit Revival in America. In Jesus' Name.

    1.2K7616211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20267.4x their median

    A writer for The Federalist acts exactly like you’d expect, spewing “heritage American” nonsense. “Heritage American” is a made-up term for bitter people who desperately want to feel relevant. https://t.co/ygZY4LiYbU

    614771892033K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.8x their median

    FYI SCOTUS shoots down mail-in-voting in biggest win for vote integrity to date. Supremes allow Trump's EO re USPS regs to take effect for Midterms. Big loss for Dems and Progressives.

    730962312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.3x their median

    I voted for Trump 3 times and all I got was lousy gas prices.

    463342402869K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.3x their median

    FYI Federal Judge lifts last restriction on Trump's USPS EO re mail-in voting ahead of the Midterm elections in November, thus ending the battle. Mail in ballots will be heavily regulated, specifically in Blue and Battleground States. We won the war.

    5617511316K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.1x their median

    2032 cannot come fast enough. 2028 is gone, the remaining maga boomers will put JD in the top spot. I will not vote for him. He will lose the white house. In 2032 we get to start a new conservative movement void of many of the boomers who will be dead, and void of “MAGA” admins losers who will be in hiding after whatever Dem takes take White House with a Dem house and senate are done with them. The goal is 2026 and 2028 has to be to purge the party of MAGA sycophants. We need true conservatives elected to state houses state senates and as many to fed offices as possible.

    326311381121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.7x their median

    FYI SCOTUS rules 6-3 to allow the Trump Administration to enact a modified SAVE Act and expand its voter citizenship verification system which uses Social Security records to check voters' citizenship status. After years of battles. A big win.

    379581426.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.4x their median

    Believers, requesting prayer for my blessed Mom. She is having recent issues with her leg. Please pray the good Lord heals her, in Jesus Name. Amen. Thank you for all the prayers. Your prayers in 2023 were instrumental in God healing her of cancer. Never doubt the Jesus. https://t.co/mpnpnIRRWT

    232233925.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.7x their median

    We must stop being distracted by nonsense and focus: Socialists and Muslims are quietly taking over our country one race at a time. Vote. Denaturalize. Deport.

    17134404.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 3.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video and 13% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is 👑 Mαχιмυs Knιgнт ♞'s engagement rate on X?
👑 Mαχιмυs Knιgнт ♞ (@Maximus_4EVR) has an engagement rate of 0.089%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 136,996 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.089%, 👑 Mαχιмυs Knιgнт ♞ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Maximus_4EVR have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Maximus_4EVR post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going