Back to @MaximeBernier's profile

Maxime Bernier engagement report

@MaximeBernier - 333K followers on X

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.092%
of 333K followers
Per impression
2.86%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
308
interactions (median)
Saved
0.074%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 333K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 2.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Maxime Bernier's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.092%, Maxime Bernier sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 497 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202622x their median

    Welcome to Mark Carney's Canada Where weird foreign men from India storm our beaches on horses while swinging around GIGANTIC SWORDS Are you fed up yet? https://t.co/2id9a82LoV

    4.8K1.3K631119207K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202615x their median

    I'm so fed up with these Indians polluting our country! Am I the only one? https://t.co/PDeZBD5DPi

    3.7K6592413152K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202611x their median

    Are we still in Canada? https://t.co/kcdciAcFdB

    2.6K4452995084K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.4x their median

    Il est temps d’interdire le voile intégral. Je le dis depuis des années : le Canada a perdu la tête avec le multiculturalisme. Alors que des pays européens comme la France, la Belgique, l'Autriche, le Danemark, la Bulgarie, la Suisse et, depuis mardi dernier, le Portugal, interdisent le port du niqab et de la burqa dans les espaces publics, notre classe politique à Ottawa refuse même d'en discuter. Les libéraux et les faux conservateurs ont trop peur de se faire traiter « d'islamophobes ». Ils se soucient davantage du multiculturalisme et du signalement de vertu que des valeurs canadiennes. Tout cela prend fin avec le Parti populaire du Canada. La burqa et le niqab ne font tout simplement pas partie des normes culturelles du Canada et n'ont pas leur place dans nos rues ni lors des cérémonies de citoyenneté. Il est absurde de faire prêter serment de citoyenneté à quelqu'un qui cache son identité visuelle. Nous n'avons rien à cacher au Canada. Le PPC s'est engagé à combattre l'islamisation du Canada. La dignité des femmes et des filles ne doit pas être sacrifiée sur l'autel du multiculturalisme. Le PPC est le seul parti national qui parle ouvertement de la menace islamiste, combat la ghettoïsation du Canada et promeut l'intégration sociale. Les partis de l’establishment ne veulent pas toucher à cette question. Le Canada n'est pas un pays de sociétés parallèles. Nous sommes un pays avec un seul ensemble de valeurs. Merci de ne pas abandonner le Canada, Partagez ce courriel, nous devons faire passer le message du PPC sur l’interdiction du voile intégral dans les espaces publics. Plus nous sommes nombreux à nous tenir ensemble, plus notre voix porte.

    1.9K352761124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.8x their median

    London. 129 km/h in a 60 zone. Mercedes T-bones a Hyundai. Joan Clubb, 67, is dead. Bahaa Ali tried to pin it on his younger brother. How PATHETIC!! Thankfully, The court didn’t buy it. He already had a record, including assault. Then another dangerous-driving charge after the conviction. CLEARLY he’s not learning from his mistakes!! Crown wants 5 years. His lawyer wants no jail. Why? Because more than 6 months and immigration gets involved. He could be sent back to Lebanon, where he belongs! So the pitch is: don’t jail the man who killed a grandmother, because it might disrupt his life. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Joan Clubb’s life wasn’t disrupted. It was ended. A sentence should fit the crime! NOT get watered down so a criminal can stay. If 6 months is the line that triggers removal, that is not a reason to go under it. That is the point of the line!! Decision is October 30. #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst

    1.4K52115739123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.5x their median

    Trump impose des tarifs de 50 % sur les biens que les Américains achètent du Canada. La réponse de Carney ? Imposer des tarifs de 50 %, 25 % et 15 % sur 900 produits américains que les Canadiens achètent. Ce n'est pas une contre-attaque. C'est une blessure auto-infligée. Bon pour la politique de Carney ? Peut-être. Bon pour l'économie canadienne ? Absolument pas. Nous ne devons pas taxer les Canadiens pour punir Washington.

    1.6K334861734K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.5x their median

    U.S. Vice-President JD Vance on Poilievre: “this guy Pierre Poilievre, who is the leader of the Conservatives in Canada,” adding he is a “non-entity” in negotiations. He is right, but not only in the free trade negotiations. @PierrePoilievre is a “non-entity” on everything. He is a fake Conservative. He is a liberal light. https://t.co/eLxcjsvmxb

    1.0K2001282580K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.0x their median

    The People's Party is the only party that will eliminate all funding to CBC, to French-language Radio-Canada and all subsidies to private media. https://t.co/eaPIEZ1Fl5

    968221441014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.1x their median

    Counter-tariffs imposed by Ottawa are ultimately a tax on Canadians. ⬇️ Last year, while most academics refused to acknowledge that reality, our Lab warned that consumers would pay the price. Food inflation did rise before PM Carney quietly lifted most of those tariffs in September 2025. With a new round of counter-tariffs taking effect next week, will food inflation rise again?

    464159241538K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.5x their median

    « We need drastic reduc­tions in both our cor­por­ate and cap­ital gains taxes – bold changes that make Canada the very best place to invest. We need finally to get ser­i­ous about free trade between provinces, about get­ting rid of costly and unne­ces­sary internal bar­ri­ers to com­merce.” I AGREE, THAT’S THE PEOPLE’S PARTY PROGRAM!

    3578922310K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 333K followers, an engagement rate of 0.092%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 2.86% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.

What is Maxime Bernier's engagement rate on X?
Maxime Bernier (@MaximeBernier) has an engagement rate of 0.092%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 332,920 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.092%, Maxime Bernier sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MaximeBernier have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MaximeBernier post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going