Back to @MatthewSantoro's profile

MatthewSantoro engagement report

@MatthewSantoro - 356K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 356K followers
Per impression
0.147%
4.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.8K times each, and 0.147% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 630x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MatthewSantoro's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, MatthewSantoro sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 46 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 28, 2024630x their median

    Diablo II was released 24 years ago today. Remember the first time you played? 💀 https://t.co/dZyPIrzPXX https://t.co/vTtzUzw8Gm

    3.5K412372171330K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 202412x their median

    No matter how many betrayals I experience or situations where people use me for their own benefit, I will continue to live and love openly. Getting hurt is an inevitable consequence of living without walls up, but it's who I am, and nobody will change me. ❤️

    755707.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 202411x their median

    Remember that nothing is ever as bad as your mind makes it out to be. Stay present. Stay in the moment. Finding a solution is always easier from a place of peace.

    6211317.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 20249.9x their median

    2020 will be 5 years ago in 6 months.

    529716.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20249.7x their median

    In the coming weeks, I am going to start releasing 2 to 3 videos a week like I used to. I've expanded my team and I'm working closely once again with three longtime friends to crank out more content for you guys. A new era is about to begin. 💪🏻

    5801006.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20247.1x their median

    Happiness is the best revenge.

    444116.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20246.4x their median

    Don't ever let anyone make you question your value or self-worth. Just because someone doesn't see it, or isn't willing to recognize it, doesn't mean you're not valuable and worthy of love. ❤️🙂‍↕️

    404105.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20245.9x their median

    It doesn't matter what happens. What matters is what you do with what happens. 🫱🏻‍🫲🏽

    374005.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20245.6x their median

    As of today our community has raised $11,937 for various charities between your donations and my matched donations! We are well on track to beat last year's total. Let's keep going! https://t.co/e8OILYkwFp

    3422132K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20245.6x their median

    Never stop. On the road to your goal you're going to hit a lot of slumps. It's not a question of if, but when. And when you know this, you'll be mentally prepared to push through when those times come. Never stop.

    345005.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7 interactions against 356K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.8K times each, and 0.147% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.4K interactions, about 630x its own typical post.

What is MatthewSantoro's engagement rate on X?
MatthewSantoro (@MatthewSantoro) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 355,805 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, MatthewSantoro sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MatthewSantoro have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MatthewSantoro post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going