Back to @MasculinePeak's profile

MP | Masculine Peak 🧠 engagement report

@MasculinePeak - 465K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.139%
of 465K followers
Per impression
3.96%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
3.50%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
644
interactions (median)
Saved
0.405%
66 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 644 interactions against 465K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 189K interactions, about 293x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

MP | Masculine Peak 🧠's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.139%, MP | Masculine Peak 🧠 sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video17% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 92 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 2026293x their median

    Bitches out here 22 tryna be a housewife girl be a hoe

    165K20K1.4K2.0K7.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 202637x their median

    She went to her ex’s place and sent me all this at 3am https://t.co/GGTfpWRl8N

    23K3835423313.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202618x their median

    Feminism is a mental disorder https://t.co/wqSSp9WCyM

    9.0K9151.3K271298K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202613x their median

    neuroscientists discovered your brain believes whatever you think on repeat, and it doesn't care if it's true. https://t.co/ezsztMRgSB

    7.5K84979155306K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202612x their median

    If you dumped your girlfriend or fiance or divorcing your wife because she supports Lindsay Clancy, than be sure one thing- you are the fool. Letting outside views and opinions dictate to you how to view your partner- is the peak of weak, my friend. If you did not have conversation with her first, to understand what exactly she supports and relates to, than congratulations- you got duped and played. Men need to know how to communicate and understand their partners without other men telling them what to think and do. So, y'all just messed up a lot of relationship. But they were doomed anyways, right? Because who the hell listens to online influencers about what they should do in/with their relationship?! Fa!

    444386.6K7791.2M viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20269.6x their median

    You're on a date with a girl, and she asks: "Why don't you have a girlfriend?" Weak man: "I just haven't found the right girl yet..." Strong man:

    5.2K153307244.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20264.4x their median

    Girls grow addicted to men who are: 1. Busy. 2. Mysterious. 3. Not afraid to walk away. Never let women get too comfortable.

    2.6K19016391K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.1x their median

    Most girls are complete losers without any hobbies or interests who just look good.

    2.5K14541331K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20263.2x their median

    If you're a good-looking man, always go for girls you think are out of your league.

    2.0K10527446K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20262.8x their median

    Girls are magnetically drawn to men who ignore them.

    1.7K9914438K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 644 interactions against 465K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 189K interactions, about 293x its own typical post.

What is MP | Masculine Peak 🧠's engagement rate on X?
MP | Masculine Peak 🧠 (@MasculinePeak) has an engagement rate of 0.139%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 465,275 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.139%, MP | Masculine Peak 🧠 sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MasculinePeak have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MasculinePeak post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going