MP | Masculine Peak 🧠engagement report
@MasculinePeak - 465K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 644 interactions against 465K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 189K interactions, about 293x its own typical post.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
MP | Masculine Peak 🧠's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.139%, MP | Masculine Peak 🧠sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 17% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 92 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 21, 2026293x their median
Bitches out here 22 tryna be a housewife girl be a hoe
- Oct 23, 202637x their median
She went to her ex’s place and sent me all this at 3am https://t.co/GGTfpWRl8N
- Sep 4, 202618x their median
Feminism is a mental disorder https://t.co/wqSSp9WCyM
- Sep 21, 202613x their median
neuroscientists discovered your brain believes whatever you think on repeat, and it doesn't care if it's true. https://t.co/ezsztMRgSB
- Aug 27, 202612x their median
If you dumped your girlfriend or fiance or divorcing your wife because she supports Lindsay Clancy, than be sure one thing- you are the fool. Letting outside views and opinions dictate to you how to view your partner- is the peak of weak, my friend. If you did not have conversation with her first, to understand what exactly she supports and relates to, than congratulations- you got duped and played. Men need to know how to communicate and understand their partners without other men telling them what to think and do. So, y'all just messed up a lot of relationship. But they were doomed anyways, right? Because who the hell listens to online influencers about what they should do in/with their relationship?! Fa!
- Jun 24, 20269.6x their median
You're on a date with a girl, and she asks: "Why don't you have a girlfriend?" Weak man: "I just haven't found the right girl yet..." Strong man:
- Oct 23, 20264.4x their median
Girls grow addicted to men who are: 1. Busy. 2. Mysterious. 3. Not afraid to walk away. Never let women get too comfortable.
- Sep 19, 20264.1x their median
Most girls are complete losers without any hobbies or interests who just look good.
- Oct 24, 20263.2x their median
If you're a good-looking man, always go for girls you think are out of your league.
- Oct 23, 20262.8x their median
Girls are magnetically drawn to men who ignore them.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 644 interactions against 465K followers, an engagement rate of 0.139%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 3.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.50% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 189K interactions, about 293x its own typical post.
- What is MP | Masculine Peak 🧠's engagement rate on X?
- MP | Masculine Peak 🧠(@MasculinePeak) has an engagement rate of 0.139%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 465,275 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.139%, MP | Masculine Peak 🧠sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MasculinePeak have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MasculinePeak post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.