Back to @Markus_Krall's profile

Dr. Markus Krall engagement report

@Markus_Krall - 306K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.207%
of 306K followers
Per impression
2.21%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
9.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
634
interactions (median)
Saved
0.054%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 634 interactions against 306K followers, an engagement rate of 0.207%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #ceuta.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Markus Krall's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.207%, Dr. Markus Krall sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link34% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 34% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 270 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202627x their median

    Der Grund dafür, warum uns keine Beweise für die angebliche russische Verwicklung in den Drohnenanschlag von Leipzig vorgelegt werden ist denkbar einfach: Es gibt keine. Und der Grund dafür ist noch einfacher: Die Russen waren es nicht, sondern es ist eine false-Flag Aktion der Deutschen und/oder der Ukrainer. Prove me wrong if you can.

    14K2.5K59862119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202615x their median

    Tu mir einen Gefallen und nimm Pappi mit. https://t.co/PNYOYymlNg

    8.1K7023523359K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    Die Bundesregierung hat endlich Beweise für die russische Täterschaft in Leipzig vorgelegt. https://t.co/oNUxxASOym

    6.1K86618336101K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202611x their median

    Mit der eskalierenden Kriegstreiberei der Bundesregierung bekommt die Wahl in Sachsen-Anhalt zusätzliche Bedeutung. Die Bürger von Sachsen-Anhalt haben am 6.9. die Möglichkeit, dieser kriegsgeilen Regierung das Misstrauen auszusprechen und ein unmissverständliches Signal auszusenden, dass das deutsche Volk keinen Krieg will. Das geht nur mit der Wahl der AfD.

    5.9K1.1K1071642K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20268.6x their median

    Noch ein Grund AfD zu wählen. https://t.co/7SHazJb5Dz

    4.8K4341711329K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.2x their median

    Wenn die Hyperschalraketen in Berlin einschlagen, wird sich Lügenkanzler Merz umdrehen und feststellen, dass kein einziger dieser gratismutigen Hetzer dann noch hinter ihm steht. Paris, London, Madrid, Brüssel werden nicht für Berlin geopfert. Never. https://t.co/XS9o6hG5Qh

    4.3K6752462955K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20267.3x their median

    passt doch. https://t.co/Je9KlNADK5

    4.0K540681228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20263.9x their median

    Tausende von alten DDR-Stasi-Kadern haben die deutschen Behörden infiltriert und ihre DDR-Version von "unserer Demokratie" mit Unterstützung von Leuten wie Merkel, Faeser, Esken, Scholz, Merz und Dobrindt installiert. Mauerschütze Hüber, bis zu seinem unfreiwilligen Rücktritt stellvertretender Chef der Gewerkschaft der Polizei ist nur ein aufgeflogenes Beispiel. Diese Stasi-Kader sind es schon zu DDR Zeiten gewohnt gewesen, alle Wahlergebnisse zu fälschen. Mit solchen Leuten zu tausenden an den Schaltstellen der Verwaltung kann mir keiner erzählen, dass ich nicht Misstrauisch gegenüber den Wahlergebnissen dieser "Unsere Demokratie" sein soll.

    2.1K34959620K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.8x their median

    Berliner Bischof der katholischen Kirchensteuerkirche, Herr Koch, ruft AfD-Wähler auf, sich ihre Kirchensteuer zu sparen: "Die Frage, ob die Kirche das Risiko eingehen müsse, im Zuge ihrer Positionierung AfD-Wähler zu verlieren, bejahte der Berliner Erzbischof: 'Ja, wir müssen dieses Risiko eingehen'." https://t.co/QcQ3plfHAx

    1.2K2043203151K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.4x their median

    Das Frau Merkels "unsere Demokratie" nicht die Demokratie des GG und damit auch nicht meine, sondern eine Neuauflage der DDR-"Demokratie" ist, sch***e ich darauf. https://t.co/vEZdYo3Q1K

    1.2K153111920K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ceuta

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 634 interactions against 306K followers, an engagement rate of 0.207%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 2.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Markus Krall's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Markus Krall (@Markus_Krall) has an engagement rate of 0.207%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 306,480 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.207%, Dr. Markus Krall sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Markus_Krall have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Markus_Krall post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going