Back to @Mark_Levengood's profile

Mark Levengood engagement report

@Mark_Levengood - 262K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.921%
of 262K followers
Per impression
1.66%
145K views on a typical post
Reach
55.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
16 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.921%. Posts are seen about 145K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 55.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.6K interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.921%, Mark Levengood sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.672% to 2.54%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,787 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 284 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 20222.7x their median

    Förstår inte varför det anses lite oartigt att påpeka att SD har sina rötter (och mycket av sin politik) i nazismen. Nazism är inte en fråga om vett och etikett. Det är en extrem ideologi som ledde till massmord och förintelse. Det enda anständiga är att ta avstånd från SD.

    4.7K6551.2K81View on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    Det är för mig så ofattbart att folk har överseende med att SD har sina rötter i nazismen och fortfarande, illa dolt, bär på alltför mycket av dess tankegods! Man kan väl inte vifta bort att nazismen stod för ett av de värsta brotten i mänsklighetens historia? https://t.co/UmfvTKolm4

    8141121.5K32145K viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 2019

    Tycker Åkesson gott kunde återvända till skolbänken och läsa på om Sverigedemokraternas sunkiga nazi-rötter. Greta har gjort mer nytta på 6 månader än Jimmie under hela sin politiska karriär, och det med hederligare medel! https://t.co/o8SWrfYgQ4

    1.6K2267415View on X
  • Sep 10, 2018

    Lyssnar på Jimmy Åkesson och påminns så starkt om att SD är ett nyfascistiskt parti med sina rötter djupt i nazismen. Så glad att över 80% inte lät sig luras av den där smörjan.

    1.5K132676View on X
  • Sep 7, 2019

    Det går bra för SD nu. Låt oss komma ihåg att Sveriges idag andra största parti har rötterna i nazism, och att det tänkandet fortfarande genomströmmar partiet och dess medlemmar. Och så kan vi gå tillbaka och fira lördag.

    1.0K11922613View on X
  • Sep 6, 2018

    Visst är vi ense? ❤️🇸🇪 https://t.co/CjFOPTc5u9

    74699415View on X
  • Jul 18, 2018

    Flygpassagerarna ställde sig upp i protest – utvisning stoppades Ibland blir man lycklig över att det trots allt finns modiga och bra människor! https://t.co/VhFDduDDXj

    47355338View on X
  • Jul 1, 2018

    Helt överväldigad över alla reaktioner på mitt Sommar-program! Tack kära allihopa!! ❤️ https://t.co/VLqMGR4ZCA

    3709163View on X
  • Jun 13, 2018

    Dags igen! #sommar https://t.co/5ZQbt9mte0

    280151View on X
  • Sep 3, 2018

    Precis så! https://t.co/bjZr3B7elY

    23128157View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.4K interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.921%. Posts are seen about 145K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 55.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.6K interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Mark Levengood's engagement rate on X?
Mark Levengood (@Mark_Levengood) has an engagement rate of 0.921%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,343 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.921%, Mark Levengood sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Mark_Levengood have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Mark_Levengood post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going