Back to @MarioNawfal's profile

Mario Nawfal engagement report

@MarioNawfal - 4.0M followers on X

Measured over 986 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 4.0M followers
Per impression
0.412%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
0.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
123
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
38.53/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 986 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.412% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.753% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 38.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 986 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 755x its own typical post.

Measured over 986 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mario Nawfal's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Mario Nawfal sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link41% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 507 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026755x their median

    SHE REALLY DIDN’T NEED TO SAY A WORD. Sydney Sweeney just posted these ESPN Body Issue shots after the backlash. Now the comparison is getting interesting. https://t.co/QSYGswh4dR

    86K5.2K8773807.3M viewsView on X
  • Apr 10, 2026763x their median

    Tesla Semi

    76K8.9K4.0K28216M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026606x their median

    Nigerian mechanic shows off his strength as he single-handedly lifts a car engine and walks with it. https://t.co/nfC75ipSLa

    67K3.5K2.6K1.8K47M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026605x their median

    Maya Higa went thrifting at Goodwill to find her wedding dress after recently getting engaged and ended up finding the perfect one for just $25.99 instead of spending thousands of dollars https://t.co/RUQOHA8sSL

    73K53738623014M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026244x their median

    🚨🇺🇸 BREAKING: SCARY SCENE in the UFC tonight as fighter immediately rushed to the hospital after going LIMP during a takedown Raoni Barcelos appeared to go limp during a takedown in his main event against Raul Rosas Jr. in Las Vegas and never got back up. The broadcast cut away from the stretcher but caught medics rushing him out of the cage with his body limp, and he was taken straight to the hospital. Rosas got the win and spent the aftermath looking shaken, which says plenty about how bad it looked up close. There is no word yet on his condition. Prayers to him and his family🙏 Source: Paramount+ / Writer: Daniel

    28K9615001266.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 2026239x their median

    The difference between those who have everything and those with nothing in this world is heartbreaking 💔 Source: ferdychildrenfoundation1 on IG / Writer: Ian https://t.co/Nue2kXFUg1

    20K7.1K1.8K590925K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026186x their median

    Pakistan's PM just nominated Trump for the Nobel PEACE Prize Sucking up just reached a new peak

    18K4.1K727239436K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026150x their median

    12 years ago, Chloe had NO IDEA she'd become the internet's most iconic reaction 😂❤️ https://t.co/FC74IbTDhG

    17K1.4K10126678K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026167x their median

    Congrats Giga Shanghai team!

    14K1.3K925702.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026132x their median

    🚨🇵🇸🇮🇱 I'M GOING TO BE SICK Google updated its Gaza maps with extensive high-res satellite imagery... it's hard to even stomach it. Apocalyptic levels of destruction. We already knew, but for anyone who wasn't convinced... Have a look for yourself. Source: SoarAtlas, Google Maps, @AbubakerAbedW / Writer: Michael

    11K3.6K1.8K252640K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 4.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 986 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 0.412% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.753% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 38.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 986 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 93K interactions, about 755x its own typical post.

What is Mario Nawfal's engagement rate on X?
Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 986 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,967,210 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Mario Nawfal sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MarioNawfal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MarioNawfal post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 38.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going