Mandy engagement report
@MarindaVannoy1 - 329K followers on X
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 698 interactions against 329K followers, an engagement rate of 0.212%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 6.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.
Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Mandy's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.212%, Mandy sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 13% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 186 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202625x their median
If your girlfriend supports Lindsay Clancy, dump her. She’s a psycho.
- Aug 31, 202613x their median
It wouldn’t take men 3 days to decide a murder is a murderer. Just saying.
- Sep 2, 202611x their median
I don’t see why liberals are so upset about the Times Square stabber being shot. She’ll still be voting Democrat come November.
- Aug 29, 20267.9x their median
I am now completely convinced that liberal women are just demons who walk freely among us.
- Aug 29, 20265.6x their median
Cora was five. That is the detail that stays with you. Unlike Dawson, who was three, or Callan, who was eight months old and still lived in a world of warmth, milk, and faces that meant safety, Cora had already crossed the threshold where a child begins to understand. She knew her mother’s voice. She knew the person strangling her was supposed to protect her. In her final terrifying moments she would have understood that something was terribly wrong. The person she trusted most had become the source of her terror. A five year old can recognize danger, feel the shift from comfort to threat, and look into a familiar face that no longer matches the love she expected. That sudden, complete betrayal is almost unbearable to imagine. Horrifying. Dawson and Callan were spared that knowledge. Cora was not. She was old enough to know what was happening, and that knowledge makes her death twice a brutal. Justice for Cora, Dawson, and Callan.
- Sep 2, 20265.1x their median
Guns don’t kill people, but liberal white women do.
- Aug 29, 20264.4x their median
If TikTok were deleted, Earth's overall IQ would go up 15%.
- Sep 2, 20263.9x their median
Lindsay Clancy is a serial killer. Point blank, end of story. This isn’t hard.
- Sep 2, 20263.4x their median
If there is a hung jury, I would ask for a change of venue. I have it on good authority that Salem, Massachusetts, knows how to deal with demonic spirits.
- Aug 31, 20263.0x their median
Lindsay Clancy should be charged with first degree murder. Anything less is an injustice to those three beautiful babies and her ex husband.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 698 interactions against 329K followers, an engagement rate of 0.212%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 6.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 25x its own typical post.
- What is Mandy's engagement rate on X?
- Mandy (@MarindaVannoy1) has an engagement rate of 0.212%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 329,337 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.212%, Mandy sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @MarindaVannoy1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @MarindaVannoy1 post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.