Back to @MarinaPurkiss's profile

Marina Purkiss engagement report

@MarinaPurkiss - 491K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.182%
of 491K followers
Per impression
3.59%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
5.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
894
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.182%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 3.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 113K interactions, about 126x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Marina Purkiss's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.182%, Marina Purkiss sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 19, 2013126x their median

    Do you think Putin will be going to The Miss Universe Pageant in November in Moscow - if so, will he become my new best friend?

    42K49K4.6K17KView on X
  • Sep 5, 202629x their median

    So many heat casualties at this Texas State vs Texas game. I haven't seen anything like this in a long time. Already seen paramedics bring 4 stretches in and it's still Q1. People are huddled in the stadium like it's a hurricane shelter. 2:30pm kickoff is a certified disaster. 🥵 https://t.co/Z5DiZfgWy2

    23K1.2K1.1K5525.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202613x their median

    Members of Britain's Biggest ever Child Sex Ring have been sentenced to a total of 145 years in prison, yet we are told that Muslims are the biggest danger to our children. https://t.co/buegPYSfs2

    6.9K2.9K1.2K301782K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20269.0x their median

    Trump on Jon Husted: "I'm studying his body. I've never studied the body of a man before. It's not my thing. Nothing wrong with it, of course. But it's never been my thing. But I looked at his ass. I said, 'His ass, shit, it's like a pile of muscle.' Then I looked at his legs and I said, 'Man, his feet are big.'"

    5.5K9157528622.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20265.3x their median

    What a… War-mongering 
Epstein-file-hiding 
Felony-racking 
Putin-bidding 
Netanyahu-enabling 
Corruption-chasing 
Wife-cheating Child-caging 
Lie-spouting Constitution-shredding 
Economy-f*cking Planet-wrecking …piece of shit of a man.

    4.0K524157676K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.5x their median

    Daily Mail… you are a joke. Nothing of your precious Reform …and instead, you go with this anti-patriotic headline based on Kemi Badenoch’s vibes. Pathetic. https://t.co/4bl08vt2Et

    3.5K3981341078K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.1x their median

    Trump says he might change the names of the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans next https://t.co/460MysiWKa

    1.9K4578634541.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20264.1x their median

    American oil executives warned for months that the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz was bound to cause a fuel crisis. Now, they say it is here. https://t.co/SbkdduJkUh

    2.2K1.2K55109500K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.9x their median

    Striking new data today: asylum backlog at six-year low... https://t.co/WJyyFC3YmZ

    1.8K583907127415K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.2x their median

    JD Vance on the economy: "You don't turn the Titanic around overnight" https://t.co/JK7EDGr0Cn

    1.3K182737702942K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 491K followers, an engagement rate of 0.182%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 3.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 113K interactions, about 126x its own typical post.

What is Marina Purkiss's engagement rate on X?
Marina Purkiss (@MarinaPurkiss) has an engagement rate of 0.182%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 491,492 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.182%, Marina Purkiss sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MarinaPurkiss have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MarinaPurkiss post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going