Back to @MariaesPueblo's profile

María Alejandra Díaz Marín🐞🦗🦎🐝🐜 engagement report

@MariaesPueblo - 105K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.137%
of 105K followers
Per impression
3.83%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
3.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
144
interactions (median)
Saved
0.093%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 144 interactions against 105K followers, an engagement rate of 0.137%. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 3.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #el13oct, #12oct, #absoluciondejeanmendoza. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #el13oct, #12oct, #absoluciondejeanmendoza.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.137%, María Alejandra Díaz Marín🐞🦗🦎🐝🐜 sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,342 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 919 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 11, 202626x their median

    Esto me voló la cabeza. En ciudades mineras de Venezuela no se usa ni el dólar ni el bolívar venezolano sino el ORO para hacer compras básicas. 🤯 https://t.co/YWyCXKJPKG

    3.0K5818567245K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20264.8x their median

    🚨Niños indígenas en minas ilegales del #CaroniMedio Se evidencia -una vez más- trabajo infantil, aculturación, esclavitud moderna en el Sector 3 #GranSabana Región ambientalmente protegida x Ley, pero ninguna autoridad desea q se detenga la devastación y violación d #DDHH https://t.co/qsiTnyRrj3

    2564165198.5K viewsView on X
  • Nov 25, 20243.0x their median

    https://t.co/nJ01LSXD5m

    26611445564K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20261.6x their median

    En cualquier momento le harán un homenaje a los pilotos gringos que bombardearon Caracas Y ellos dicen tenemos el poder y la soberanía… Poder ? Soberanía? PD; No aceptó insultos en inglés y menos de influencers del ministerio de comunicación y de los mariacorinos https://t.co/vVRPSiYbWG

    1196837113.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026

    EL FIN DE LA PRIMACÍA MILITAR ESTADOUNIDENSE: ¿EL OCASO DE LA HEGEMONÍA OCCIDENTAL? Durante décadas, Estados Unidos proyectó una imagen de superioridad militar incuestionable. Sin embargo, los conflictos recientes han puesto en evidencia los límites del poder aéreo, la tecnología y las estrategias de intervención utilizadas para imponer cambios políticos. En una entrevista con el académico noruego Glenn Diesen, el comodoro retirado de la Marina Real Británica Steve Jermy plantea una cuestión fundamental: ¿puede una superpotencia alcanzar sus objetivos estratégicos únicamente mediante bombardeos y la eliminación de dirigentes? La experiencia histórica sugiere que no. La destrucción de infraestructuras y la neutralización de liderazgos no garantizan el derrocamiento de un gobierno ni la instauración de un sistema político favorable a los intereses de quien ataca. Por el contrario, pueden fortalecer la cohesión nacional, alimentar la resistencia y convertir una operación militar en un conflicto prolongado. La estrategia de países como Irán no necesariamente consiste en derrotar convencionalmente a Estados Unidos, sino en resistir, preservar su capacidad de respuesta y elevar los costes humanos, económicos y militares de la intervención. Cuando una potencia no consigue una victoria rápida, sus recursos se desgastan y su credibilidad estratégica puede deteriorarse. A ello se suma el avance de Rusia, China y otras potencias, cuyas capacidades militares y sistemas de negación de acceso restringen la libertad de acción occidental en regiones estratégicas. El resultado es un escenario internacional cada vez más complejo, donde la superioridad tecnológica no equivale automáticamente a una victoria política. Europa también enfrenta las consecuencias de sus decisiones estratégicas, especialmente cuando la confrontación geopolítica repercute sobre la seguridad energética, la competitividad industrial y la estabilidad económica. ¿Significa esto que Estados Unidos ha perdido definitivamente su primacía militar? Sería prematuro afirmarlo en términos absolutos. Lo que sí está en discusión es su capacidad para transformar esa superioridad en resultados políticos duraderos. La gran lección geopolítica es clara: disponer de las armas más poderosas no significa poder imponer la voluntad propia a cualquier sociedad. El mundo avanza hacia una distribución más compleja del poder. Ignorar esa transformación y privilegiar la confrontación sobre la diplomacia puede agravar los conflictos y acelerar el desgaste de las potencias involucradas. La verdadera fortaleza estratégica no consiste solamente en ganar guerras, sino en evitar aquellas que no pueden ganarse a un coste aceptable. ¿Podrá Washington adaptarse a un orden multipolar o insistirá en una estrategia de confrontación que erosione su influencia global. La gran excepción en este contexto planteado es el caso Venezuela. Vale la pena preguntarse ¿por qué? MADM

    2322711.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026

    ALERTA | ¡ÚLTIMA HORA!| Sala Constitucional del TSJ declaró “constitucional” el decreto firmado por Delcy Rodríguez y avaló la prórroga del Estado de Emergencia Económica en Venezuela por 60 días más. Fuente: ¡DIFUNDELO YA! cuenta X https://t.co/nPRvPFcOGB

    172214.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#el13oct#12oct#absoluciondejeanmendoza#venezuelafragmentada

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 144 interactions against 105K followers, an engagement rate of 0.137%. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 3.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 26x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #el13oct, #12oct, #absoluciondejeanmendoza. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is María Alejandra Díaz Marín🐞🦗🦎🐝🐜's engagement rate on X?
María Alejandra Díaz Marín🐞🦗🦎🐝🐜 (@MariaesPueblo) has an engagement rate of 0.137%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 104,901 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.137%, María Alejandra Díaz Marín🐞🦗🦎🐝🐜 sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MariaesPueblo have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @MariaesPueblo post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going