Back to @MarGomezH's profile

Mar Gómez engagement report

@MarGomezH - 467K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 467K followers
Per impression
0.465%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
10.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
225
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
27 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.2/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 225 interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.465% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #projecte4estacions, #nepal, #rasuwa.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #projecte4estacions, #nepal, #rasuwa.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mar Gómez's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, Mar Gómez sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,870 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 268 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202627x their median

    🔴 Catastrophe sur l’A36 près de #Besançon (25) où plusieurs milliers d’automobilistes sont restés coincés sous l’#orage supercellulaire ce jeudi soir ! De nombreux véhicules ont été immobilisés, en raison de pare-brises criblés de grêlons géants ! Images par cal_yunus_ 📸 https://t.co/SdhDLTc0ZQ

    4.5K1.2K2051931.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202613x their median

    🔴 Entre Besançon (25) et Baume-les-Dames (25) ce jeudi soir, des #grêlons de 4 à 8cm se sont abattus au passage d’un orage supercellulaire dévastateur ! Images de #Pouligney (25) par FabienneBonnet 📸 https://t.co/a54DToREGn

    2.3K5854872519K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202610x their median

    🧵 El Niño se intensifica y enciende las alarmas: la NOAA advierte de que podría alcanzar una magnitud histórica. Hay más de un 90 % de probabilidad de que sea un El Niño MUY FUERTE este otoño e invierno. Pero ¿qué está ocurriendo realmente en el Pacífico y cómo puede afectar al planeta? 👇🌍

    1.8K4552920189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20269.7x their median

    🚨 Indonesia's Mt. Anak Krakatau erupted Friday September 4 overnight into Saturday, spewing rocks and volcanic ash into the air. Another eruption occurred in the following hours, with the height of the column of black smoke observed at over 1,000 meters. https://t.co/hmDClI85Ne

    1.8K3652836View on X
  • Aug 22, 20268.1x their median

    🌀 Una borrasca muy poco habitual está avanzando hacia la Península… y hasta el Centro Nacional de Huracanes de EEUU la está vigilando. No es un huracán. Pero podría adquirir temporalmente características subtropicales o tropicales. ¿Qué está pasando? Hilo 🧵👇 https://t.co/u6CSsRUNP7

    1.5K2981825179K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.4x their median

    Une très forte tempête vient de frapper le sud de la région parisienne, notamment dans le secteur de Vitry et Alfortville. Le bilan est encore inconnu. https://t.co/GFFnaW3Vh1

    1.1K2982472750K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.9x their median

    😱 Tornade incroyable en région parisienne. Ça fait peur. https://t.co/b0phtuqOQo

    1.0K2204228165K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.4x their median

    Severa tormenta con vientos huracanados golpean Zurich, Suiza. https://t.co/Hvn0DKjJ7G

    92425872053K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.1x their median

    Última actualización: El USGS registró primero un supuesto terremoto de magnitud 4,4 en Nepal, pero posteriormente revisó los datos. El análisis de las ondas sísmicas de largo periodo indica que en realidad esa señal fue producida por el enorme movimiento de la montaña, es decir, por el propio deslizamiento de tierra y hielo. El evento aparece ahora catalogado como un deslizamiento equivalente a una magnitud 5,2.

    9441915740K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20264.9x their median

    Así esta Torrent ahora mismo. Video del @Aj_Torrent https://t.co/B8ROLf85bP

    7842502242297K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#projecte4estacions#nepal#rasuwa#valencia#besançon

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 225 interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 0.465% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #projecte4estacions, #nepal, #rasuwa.

What is Mar Gómez's engagement rate on X?
Mar Gómez (@MarGomezH) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 466,953 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, Mar Gómez sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @MarGomezH have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @MarGomezH post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going