Back to @Mappy6984's profile

NRM84 engagement report

@Mappy6984 - 427K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.061%
of 427K followers
Per impression
1.95%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
3.12%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
256
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.93/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 256 interactions against 427K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 102x its own typical post.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

NRM84's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.061%, NRM84 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 153 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 2026102x their median

    Take a look at this..... man what a situation to be in. Attached is the article as well. The situation is toxic from the get go.. https://t.co/5Ond1ll70t https://t.co/4eECa7U7mj

    21K9713.4K1921.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202658x their median

    Give this a listen, besides 3rd term bs pretty logical if you ask me https://t.co/7dkPweqYP8

    12K1.5K1.2K145332K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202613x their median

    Ya know, burns are the worst thing to ever happen to someone.. trust me I know. Takes away your looks, confidence and sometimes everything. I wouldn't wish burns on anyone but life does go on and you most certainly adapt. https://t.co/j4UvrwU5xp

    3.0K2251451238K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    There's only one word to describe MAGA Republicans: Cowards. They will criticize Trump in private and then vote for his ridiculous wars in public. The American people deserve leaders with a backbone. https://t.co/AWRaXPK5Db

    1.8K3698782050K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.0x their median

    Lincoln Police Capt. Mayde McGuire and her partner were fishing at Nebraska’s Pawnee Lake while their 2-year-old daughter was reportedly left alone in a locked, non-running van with the windows up for at least 28 minutes. Bystanders heard the little girl screaming, saw her banging on the window and called 911. McGuire removed her before deputies arrived. Authorities say McGuire’s preliminary breath test registered 0.108. Both women were cited for misdemeanor child abuse, and McGuire was placed on leave. A police captain should understand better than most how quickly a locked vehicle can become deadly. Thank God those strangers paid attention and called for help. This story could have ended very differently.

    1.3K5061923782K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20267.6x their median

    Who in the hell can afford this??? Guys truly don't care about woman's hair. This is strictly competition between woman https://t.co/SRjZSJdFrG

    1.4K743924078K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.0x their median

    Are those all his wives🤣🤣🤣 these people are so insufferable, they are EVERYWHERE here in Illinois. Unreal. Don't like it leave. Your faces are not even exposed weirdos https://t.co/uPVQSPh3HN

    1.3K2432762770K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.0x their median

    Not sure as a parent how it gets to this level of not caring about your kids. Making a huge mess that you'll have to clean up anyways https://t.co/wUF5ZIhb2n

    1.1K11652341150K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20265.7x their median

    Crazy to think after 50 years of being gone, its like you never existed. Can't take anything with you after the ride is over. https://t.co/EjW5g4Nol1

    1.2K1168212365K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.1x their median

    Alcohol is so over played.. takes semi normal people and turns them into sloppy monsters. Trust me I used to love getting hammered but than I grew up. If people only knew how stupid they look smashed https://t.co/D7DWFPUqPt

    1.0K382225199K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 256 interactions against 427K followers, an engagement rate of 0.061%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.95% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 5% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 102x its own typical post.

What is NRM84's engagement rate on X?
NRM84 (@Mappy6984) has an engagement rate of 0.061%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 426,988 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.061%, NRM84 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Mappy6984 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Mappy6984 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going