Back to @ManesF's profile

Facundo Manes engagement report

@ManesF - 305K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 305K followers
Per impression
0.763%
7.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
59
interactions (median)
Saved
0.065%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 372x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cientificidio, #cuentasclaras.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026. Recurring tags: #cientificidio, #cuentasclaras.

Compared with accounts its own size

Facundo Manes's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, Facundo Manes sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 857 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 21, 2026372x their median

    En la Facultad de Medicina de la UBA, los estudiantes de la carrera de nutrición cocinan y reparten comida para la gente en situación de calle. https://t.co/UgSv4IW2UV https://t.co/2PMaQeJj1R

    19K2.7K181185911K viewsView on X
  • Jun 8, 202647x their median

    Querido Indio, vine a despedirte. El dolor y el afecto de la gente era inmenso. Acompañaste a un pueblo. Gracias. https://t.co/FImSONhRUr

    2.3K8137845118K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 202636x their median

    Momento Epico @manujove https://t.co/cVpvB41GxQ

    2.0K941812137K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 202631x their median

    LOS ALUMNOS ARGENTINOS MÁS RICOS RINDEN COMO LOS MÁS POBRES DE PAÍSES DESARROLLADOS Los alumnos argentinos del 25% de hogares con mayores ingresos obtuvieron 420 puntos en Matemática en la prueba PISA 2022. Ese desempeño es inferior al del cuartil más vulnerable de Alemania, Italia, España y Reino Unido. Además, el 51% no alcanza el nivel básico. Especialistas atribuyen el bajo rendimiento a problemas estructurales como la formación docente, el ausentismo, el clima escolar, el uso de celulares en clase y los métodos de enseñanza. También advierten que el sistema educativo fue reduciendo la exigencia en las últimas décadas. Testimonios de especialistas “Con salarios, oportunidades de carrera, formación y trabajo en equipo insuficientes, los docentes enfrentan hoy serios obstáculos para desarrollar una enseñanza de calidad en una gran mayoría de las escuelas, desde las más vulnerables hasta las de más alto nivel socioeconómico” — Cecilia Veleda, investigadora de CIPPEC. “En Argentina el clima escolar es considerablemente más desfavorable para el aprendizaje que el promedio de los países desarrollados. Existe un clima escolar pedagógicamente débil y desordenado. El tiempo neto de aprendizaje es sumamente corto y fragmentado” — Claudia Romero, doctora en Educación. “Es necesario implementar programas que realmente funcionen, modificar las metodologías de enseñanza y transformar la manera en que se acompaña a los alumnos” — Florencia Salvarezza, especialista en Lingüística, Neurociencias y Educación. (+) en Clarín: https://t.co/V5ao8c7ywD

    1.3K252106123237K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202615x their median

    Volver a encontrarme con el Patón Bauza en Ecuador fue uno de los momentos más emotivos de este viaje. Lo había conocido hace algunos años en Buenos Aires. Hoy volvimos a vernos en Quito, en otra etapa de su vida. El Patón dejó una huella enorme en el fútbol argentino, pero también construyó un vínculo muy especial con Ecuador, donde es profundamente querido. Su historia deportiva habla de talento, liderazgo y fortaleza. Pero esta etapa de su vida nos muestra también otra dimensión de lo humano. La demencia frontotemporal transforma profundamente la vida de una persona y la de toda su familia. Frente a enfermedades así, cuando tantas capacidades empiezan a cambiar, hay algo que sigue siendo esencial: el afecto, la presencia y el cuidado. Me conmovió especialmente reencontrarme también con Maritza y ver el amor, la entereza y la dedicación con la que acompaña al Patón. Detrás de cada persona que atraviesa una enfermedad neurodegenerativa hay una familia y, muchas veces, un cuidador sosteniendo silenciosamente una parte enorme de esa historia. Hablar de estas enfermedades ayuda a comprenderlas, a reducir el estigma y, sobre todo, a recordar que detrás de cada diagnóstico hay una persona que merece seguir siendo mirada con respeto, cariño y dignidad. Gracias, Patón, por este reencuentro. Y gracias, Maritza, por la enorme tarea de cuidar. Para quienes quieran conocer un poco más de su historia, les recomiendo este documental realizado por la Fundación TASE con la colaboración del Patón y su familia: https://t.co/NSD51Phnim

    7885948752K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20269.6x their median

    La Argentina está destruyendo una de las capacidades estratégicas más valiosas que construyó en décadas: su sistema científico y tecnológico. La inversión en Ciencia y Tecnología cayó al 0,14% del PBI, el nivel más bajo desde que hay registros (1972). Estamos por debajo de países como México o Colombia, que invierten más del doble. Se pierden investigadores, se paralizan proyectos y se debilitan instituciones que llevaron décadas construir. Si la Argentina quiere una prosperidad para todos, y no solo para una minoría, necesita agregar cada vez más valor y conocimiento a lo que produce y exporta. Eso requiere innovación, ciencia y tecnología. Destruir la ciencia es hipotecar el futuro. Sin conocimiento propio no hay desarrollo, soberanía, ni progreso sostenible. Argentina necesita más ciencia, no menos.

    411114331020K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 20264.3x their median

    Mi solidaridad con Débora Plager. La crítica al periodismo es parte de la democracia; el agravio personal desde el poder, no. Descalificar a periodistas genera inseguridad psicológica, empobrece la conversación pública y debilita a la prensa como contrapeso democrático. No es casual: suele ser una estrategia de liderazgos que avanzan hacia formas autoritarias. Degradar al periodismo es degradar la democracia.

    150524915.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.2x their median

    Pensé que era una percepción mía, pero coincido totalmente con @mundochristophe: la manteca argentina, en general, es muy mala. Resulta inexplicable en un país con semejante potencial lechero. Deberíamos producir una manteca de mucha mejor calidad. Y también coincido con él en que la manteca uruguaya es claramente superior.

    1891239832K viewsView on X
  • Jun 5, 20264.2x their median

    Gracias, Indio, por tu arte y tu música, que tanto disfruté. Fue, además, un privilegio haberte conocido personalmente. https://t.co/WDicY9pJeL

    22711804.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20262.5x their median

    Interesante análisis de Jorge Liotti sobre los “huérfanos de la polarización”. Una parte creciente de la sociedad no quiere volver al pasado, pero tampoco acepta un presente de agresión permanente, deterioro institucional y ajuste sin desarrollo. No alcanza con administrar la grieta: hay que construir una nueva mayoría para el siglo XXI. https://t.co/4d1WhoOncp

    942025710K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cientificidio#cuentasclaras

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 305K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 372x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cientificidio, #cuentasclaras.

What is Facundo Manes's engagement rate on X?
Facundo Manes (@ManesF) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 305,312 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, Facundo Manes sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ManesF have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ManesF post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going