PlayerSells
Back to @ManUtdMEN's profile

Man United News engagement report

@ManUtdMEN - 2.2M followers on X

Measured over 105 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.003%
of 2.2M followers
Per impression
0.212%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
1.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
59
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 105 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 105 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #hulmun.

Measured over 105 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #mufc, #hulmun.

Compared with accounts its own size

Man United News's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Man United News sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.006%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.319%
p902.64%
p99357.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,789 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 446,562 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.319%
90th percentile2.64%
99th percentile357.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video21% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link91% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 91% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 117 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 15, 202618x their median

    Amorim hugs some of the United players at full-time 👀 #mufc https://t.co/S2SA5pDOhN

    1.1K259172K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20269.9x their median

    Rashford is back 👊 #mufc https://t.co/NryqnH9F82

    562119039K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20268.0x their median

    2 games, 2 missed penalties for Bruno 😬 #mufc https://t.co/fbXtLA0QLm

    453152359K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20266.1x their median

    Cunha, Sesko, Mount, De Ligt - Man United injury news and return dates after AC Milan clash | #MUFC https://t.co/t2QdYpsXDt

    34737072K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20265.9x their median

    Man United transfer news LIVE: Lewis Hall truth, £85million interest, Kim Min-jae stance https://t.co/YNOCjFSVwV https://t.co/v90p5gJTtz

    328126078K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 20265.8x their median

    ‼️ Keep on top of all the United news and analysis you need with our United newsletter service. You can sign up for free to get all the big stories. Subscribe here 👉 https://t.co/3m9MzCmOl0 https://t.co/21Pyd8nsqB

    17813431086K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20265.5x their median

    United have 15 days to find the missing piece of their midfield jigsaw #mufc https://t.co/SprSzv0kCK

    2842020019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20265.1x their median

    Man United quoted £43m to complete transfer for 'tailor-made' target https://t.co/RNgzvmeBwD https://t.co/nQRkhdjOfX

    29164057K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.4x their median

    Manchester United questions answered... 😍 Lewis Hall 😬 A new midfielder ⌛ Transfer plan With @TyMarshall_MEN | #mufc https://t.co/Y01yGUQlRH

    182613057K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.2x their median

    Marcus Rashford returned for Manchester United in front of Ruben Amorim and the 65-year-old goalkeeping coach he wanted to pick ahead of him. Looked sharp when he came on, wore the No. 9 and can offer something this season https://t.co/fEqwcBQekl

    136541620K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mufc#hulmun

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 2.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 105 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 105 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 91% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #hulmun.

What is Man United News's engagement rate on X?
Man United News (@ManUtdMEN) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 105 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,232,795 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Man United News sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ManUtdMEN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ManUtdMEN post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going